add tests for incremental on field keys#2203
Closed
kinto0 wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Summary: # This stack This stack modifies the optimization for incremental updates found in the stack containing D90647539. Original optimization: Use import statements alone to understand which imports a module uses Problem: `import foo` will always invalidate `foo` This stack will modify this optimization to instead track these dependencies based on usages during solve. Every type depended on from a module will be referenced in solve and we only will need to invalidate an entire module when there is an import *. # This diff adds tests for field keys incrementality. similar to test_enum_member_change_propagates, when a field or part of a class gets added, removing a type error, we need to ensure dependents get updated. this is necessary because without D91173578, the semantic invalidation will not work Reviewed By: yangdanny97 Differential Revision: D91172436
Contributor
yangdanny97
approved these changes
Jan 22, 2026
yangdanny97
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review automatically exported from Phabricator review in Meta.
|
Diff from mypy_primer, showing the effect of this PR on open source code: openlibrary (https://github.com/internetarchive/openlibrary)
+ ERROR openlibrary/plugins/openlibrary/lists.py:811:43-813:18: Cannot set item in `dict[str, list[dict[Unknown, Unknown]]]` [unsupported-operation]
+ ERROR openlibrary/plugins/openlibrary/lists.py:818:40-88: Cannot set item in `dict[str, list[dict[Unknown, Unknown]]]` [unsupported-operation]
+ ERROR openlibrary/plugins/openlibrary/lists.py:823:42-825:18: Cannot set item in `dict[str, list[dict[Unknown, Unknown]]]` [unsupported-operation]
+ ERROR openlibrary/plugins/upstream/tests/test_merge_authors.py:142:12-52: Object of class `NoneType` has no attribute `key` [missing-attribute]
+ ::error file=openlibrary/plugins/openlibrary/lists.py,line=811,col=43,endLine=813,endColumn=18,title=Pyrefly unsupported-operation::Cannot set item in `dict[str, list[dict[Unknown, Unknown]]]`%0A Argument `list[Thing | Unknown]` is not assignable to parameter `value` with type `list[dict[Unknown, Unknown]]` in function `dict.__setitem__`
+ ::error file=openlibrary/plugins/openlibrary/lists.py,line=818,col=40,endLine=818,endColumn=88,title=Pyrefly unsupported-operation::Cannot set item in `dict[str, list[dict[Unknown, Unknown]]]`%0A Argument `list[Thing | Unknown]` is not assignable to parameter `value` with type `list[dict[Unknown, Unknown]]` in function `dict.__setitem__`
+ ::error file=openlibrary/plugins/openlibrary/lists.py,line=823,col=42,endLine=825,endColumn=18,title=Pyrefly unsupported-operation::Cannot set item in `dict[str, list[dict[Unknown, Unknown]]]`%0A Argument `list[Thing | Unknown]` is not assignable to parameter `value` with type `list[dict[Unknown, Unknown]]` in function `dict.__setitem__`
- ::error file=openlibrary/plugins/upstream/tests/test_merge_authors.py,line=37,col=9,endLine=37,endColumn=12,title=Pyrefly bad-override::Class member `MockSite.get` overrides parent class `Site` in an inconsistent manner%0A `MockSite.get` has type `BoundMethod[MockSite, (self: MockSite, key: Unknown) -> Unknown]`, which is not assignable to `BoundMethod[MockSite, (self: MockSite, key: Unknown, revision: Unknown | None = None, lazy: bool | Unknown = False) -> Unknown | None]`, the type of `Site.get`
+ ::error file=openlibrary/plugins/upstream/tests/test_merge_authors.py,line=37,col=9,endLine=37,endColumn=12,title=Pyrefly bad-override::Class member `MockSite.get` overrides parent class `Site` in an inconsistent manner%0A `MockSite.get` has type `BoundMethod[MockSite, (self: MockSite, key: Unknown) -> Thing | Unknown]`, which is not assignable to `BoundMethod[MockSite, (self: MockSite, key: Unknown, revision: Unknown | None = None, lazy: bool | Unknown = False) -> Thing | Unknown | None]`, the type of `Site.get`
+ ::error file=openlibrary/plugins/upstream/tests/test_merge_authors.py,line=142,col=12,endLine=142,endColumn=52,title=Pyrefly missing-attribute::Object of class `NoneType` has no attribute `key`
|
Contributor
|
This pull request has been merged in 77638e9. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary:
This stack
This stack modifies the optimization for incremental updates found in the stack containing D90647539.
Original optimization: Use import statements alone to understand which imports a module uses
Problem:
import foowill always invalidatefooThis stack will modify this optimization to instead track these dependencies based on usages during solve. Every type depended on from a module will be referenced in solve and we only will need to invalidate an entire module when there is an import *.
This diff
adds tests for field keys incrementality. similar to test_enum_member_change_propagates, when a field or part of a class gets added, removing a type error, we need to ensure dependents get updated. this is necessary because without D91173578, the semantic invalidation will not work
Reviewed By: yangdanny97
Differential Revision: D91172436