Skip to content

doc: polished godoc - #65

Merged
fredbi merged 1 commit into
go-openapi:masterfrom
fredbi:doc/fix-godoc
Feb 20, 2026
Merged

doc: polished godoc#65
fredbi merged 1 commit into
go-openapi:masterfrom
fredbi:doc/fix-godoc

Conversation

@fredbi

@fredbi fredbi commented Feb 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Applied custom godoc linter & spellcheck to fix all godoc comments.

Change type

Please select: 🆕 New feature or enhancement|🔧 Bug fix'|📃 Documentation update

Short description

Fixes

Full description

Checklist

  • I have signed all my commits with my name and email (see DCO. This does not require a PGP-signed commit
  • I have rebased and squashed my work, so only one commit remains
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • I have properly enriched go doc comments in code.
  • I have properly documented any breaking change.
Applied custom godoc linter & spellcheck to fix all godoc comments.

Signed-off-by: Frederic BIDON <fredbi@yahoo.com>
@fredbi
fredbi merged commit 9b92774 into go-openapi:master Feb 20, 2026
21 checks passed
@fredbi
fredbi deleted the doc/fix-godoc branch February 20, 2026 00:16
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Feb 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.32%. Comparing base (56b5954) to head (92706e8).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #65   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.32%   91.32%           
=======================================
  Files          91       91           
  Lines       11925    11925           
=======================================
  Hits        10890    10890           
  Misses        822      822           
  Partials      213      213           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

1 participant