Void Dynamics Model (VDM)

A background‑independent, unified metriplectic field theory with an emergent causal cone and an epistemological J→M projection.

No dense scans. Zero training. Divergent reasoning. Constraint satisfaction in the moment.

---

---

🔭 What I’m building

• VDM — Klein-Gordon / reaction–diffusion field intelligence + walker ecology + scoreboard/GDSP gating
• Memory Steering — dynamic knowledge graph with event-driven updates
• Agency — inherent, minimal energy optimization rules
• Real-time control — swap massive pretraining for fast constraint satisfaction

Reproducibility: baselines + QA artifacts are archived on Zenodo. Code lives in public GitHub repos with tests and docs.

---

🧪 Reproducible records (Zenodo)

• Latest Zenodo Upload: Counterfactual Echo Gain (CEG): Future-Aware Metriplectic Assistance Yields Gate-Certified Echo Improvement
• DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17567396)
• (with code + datasets + figures)

---

🗺️ Roadmap (Oct~Dec 2025)

• TLDR:

  1. Finishing a few algebraic proofs (CF1/QGT, Schrödingerization, T^μν_void).
  2. Converting more of the cosmology/gauge scaffolds into RESULTS documents tied to real or mock data.
  3. Packaging some of the chains (e.g., “metriplectic engine”, “A8 hierarchy → FRW”, “spinor+gauge emergence”) into stand‑alone papers.

• Unifying the VDM foundation

  • Stabilize Complete Formalism (CF*) ladder prerequisites ☑️
  • Void-lensing interface program (highest priority) ☑️
  • Lattice fields & continuum limits (CF10) ☑️
  • CMB polarization birefringence gate ☑️
  • Quantum Geometric Tensor to Metriplectic Brackets formalism ✅
  • Contact Geometry to Metripliplectic Evolution formalism ✅
  • Axiom 8 - Lietz Infinity Resolution Conjecture (Hierarchical Tachyonic Interfaces) ✅
  • Telegraph-Fisher Causality formalism (Finite-Speed Transport) ✅
  • Integrability Closure formalism (No hidden conserved quantities) ✅
  • Information Geometry Foundations — Fisher and Ruppeiner Metrics for VDM M-Limb ✅
  • Measurement Theory Foundations — Decoherence and Born Rule for VDM ✅
  • Spinor Emergence via Domain-Wall Fermions in VDM formalism ✅
  • Gauge Field Emergence via Berry Connection in VDM formalism ✅
  • VDM Lattice Hydrodynamics, Continuum Limit, and Regularity Program formalism ✅
  • Define the objects and rules everything else must obey. ✅
  • Start from quantum geometry and show why a J⊕M evolution is forced ✅
    • Finish CF1: explicit formulae for 𝓘[Ψ] and Σ[Ψ] from QGT; prove metriplectic brackets satisfy A4. ☑️
    • Close Schrödingerization proof to show “J⊕M is a shadow of pure J” in extended space. ☑️
  • Prove that a scalar lattice with J⊕M really behaves like the void field ✅
    • Package this into one “VDM metriplectic engine” paper (KG + RD + structure + Strang). I already have all the results; this is mostly editorial. ☑️
  • Explain why nothing outruns c, starting from RD‑like flows. ✅
    • Finish a RESULTS doc for Causal‑DAG audit on the KG / RD sims to empirically show: inferred cone ≈ analytic cone ☑️
  • Go from smooth void to structured interfaces (proto‑“lumps” / material features). ✅
    • One clean A8→FRW bridge paper: “tachyonic interfaces → effective ρ(a), p(a), H(a)” with explicit EOS fits ☑️
  • Turn the scalar lattice into fermionic matter degrees of freedom. ✅
    • Companion CF8 notebook with an explicit domain‑wall spectrum plot and residual mass scaling ~ e^{-λL₅} ☑️
  • Get Maxwell/Yang–Mills fields as geometry, not extra particles. ✅
    • Compute Berry curvatures from an explicit CF8 lattice model, show emergent U(1) field satisfies the Maxwell‑like equations in the long‑wavelength limit ☑️
    • Extend the formalism in H0XX into at least one concrete SU(2) toy example ☑️
  • Treat the plastic lattice + A8 hierarchy as the “dark sector” ✅
    • Define an explicit “lattice stress–energy tensor” T^μν_void[Φ] and show: ☑️
      • homogeneous part → dark‑energy‑like EOS ☑️
      • hierarchical clumping → halo‑like effective DM (at least in 1D/2D) ☑️
    • Frame a pilot SkyrmeSIDM × VDM test using the T5 proposal ☑️
  • From lattice stress–energy to something GR‑like in weak field, then test ringdown / horizons. ✅
    • Weak‑field: derive an effective Poisson equation for small lattice perturbations; fit to rotation curves / lensing in at least one toy halo ☑️
    • Strong‑field: show that certain tachyonic interface configurations behave like horizon‑like regions (redshift, QNM spectrum) and compare to GR ringdown data via the ringdown meter ☑️
  • Connect A8 + metriplectic dynamics to the 0.55 packing motif (proteins, random close packing, etc.). ✅
    • A small CF‑level derivation: show a simple metriplectic packing model tends toward ϕ≈0.55 in 2D/3D random packing (e.g., via Monte Carlo or granular‑like sim) ☑️
    • Explicit link from A8 interfaces + reaction‑diffusion morphogenesis → “prebiotic” cluster statistics ☑️
  • Use the same machinery to hit the standard checklist: SM fields, BH population, CMB, etc. ✅
    • For each H*/T* cosmology doc: at least one concrete meter/RESULTS file that touches real data (CMB, LSS, ringdown, BH mass function, etc.) even in toy form ☑️

• Notebook mirrors of each test ☑️

• 100% Reproducible, falsifiable claims ✅

• Currently working real time, zero training, self driven model ☑️

• Online causality based learning ✅

• Physics driven intelligence ✅