bwa mem: read chunk size overflows for -t > 214 - #155
Open
BenLangmead wants to merge 3 commits into
Open
BenLangmead wants to merge 3 commits into
BenLangmead wants to merge 3 commits into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When setting
-t 215or greater, an integer overflow happens when this is multiplied by 10M infastmap.c(opt->chunk_size * opt->n_threads). This results in behavior where batches seem to become very small for-tgreater than 214. I sometimes want to set-tto greater than 214 on Knight's Landing systems, which is how I noticed. These commits seem to fix it by promoting the relevantints toint64_ts.