Fix editable installs for project GUI scripts

[ychampion]

Resolves: #10481

Summary

• Install gui_scripts entry points during editable installs, alongside console_scripts.
• Add a regression for [project.gui-scripts], including the Windows .cmd wrapper path.

Validation

• . .venv/bin/activate && pytest tests/masonry/builders/test_editable_builder.py -q — passed

• . .venv/bin/activate && ruff format --check src/poetry/masonry/builders/editable.py tests/masonry/builders/test_editable_builder.py — passed

• . .venv/bin/activate && ruff check src/poetry/masonry/builders/editable.py tests/masonry/builders/test_editable_builder.py — passed

• . .venv/bin/activate && mypy src/poetry/masonry/builders/editable.py tests/masonry/builders/test_editable_builder.py — passed

• git diff --check — passed

• Added tests for changed code.

• Updated documentation for changed code. Existing docs already say to run poetry install after adding GUI scripts.

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey - I've found 1 issue

Prompt for AI Agents

Please address the comments from this code review:

## Individual Comments

### Comment 1
<location path="tests/masonry/builders/test_editable_builder.py" line_range="268-277" />
<code_context>
+def test_builder_installs_project_gui_scripts(
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
**suggestion (testing):** Add a complementary test for non-Windows behavior of `project.gui-scripts`.

This test only covers the Windows branch by forcing `WINDOWS = True` and checking the `.cmd` wrapper. Please also cover the non-Windows branch (e.g., via a second test or parametrization with `WINDOWS = False`) and assert that the `foo-gui` script is created and recorded in `RECORD`, and that no `.cmd` file is created. That way both platform branches of `_add_scripts` for `gui_scripts` are exercised.

Suggested implementation:

```python
@pytest.mark.parametrize("windows", (True, False))
def test_builder_installs_project_gui_scripts(
    tmp_path: Path, fixture_dir: FixtureDirGetter, mocker: MockerFixture, windows: bool
) -> None:

```

To fully implement the requested behavior, you should also:

1. Ensure `pytest` is imported at the top of the file if it is not already:
   - Add `import pytest` alongside the other imports.

2. Inside `test_builder_installs_project_gui_scripts`, after constructing `poetry` and before running the builder, patch the `WINDOWS` flag used by the editable builder:
   - Example:
     ```python
     mocker.patch("poetry.masonry.builders.editable.WINDOWS", windows)
     ```
   - If the module path differs, patch the correct module where `WINDOWS` is defined.

3. After running the builder (whatever code currently triggers script installation), add assertions that depend on `windows`:
   - For both branches:
     - Assert that the `foo-gui` script is recorded in `RECORD` (likely by inspecting the wheel or record file the test is already checking).
   - For `windows is True`:
     - Assert that a `foo-gui.cmd` file exists in the venv’s `bin`/`Scripts` directory.
   - For `windows is False`:
     - Assert that a `foo-gui` script exists (no `.cmd` suffix).
     - Assert that no `foo-gui.cmd` file is created.

4. Reuse whatever helpers/fixtures the existing test uses to locate the `bin` directory and `RECORD` file, following the established conventions in this file (e.g., `tmp_venv._bin_dir`, existing assertions from the script test just above).
</issue_to_address>

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[radoering]

Thanks for your contribution and @Sanjays2402 thanks for the review. I would have probably miss this one.

[github-actions]

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.