Skip to content

Update COMPARED_WITH_PRY.md#984

Merged
st0012 merged 1 commit into
ruby:masterfrom
alessandro-fazzi:patch-1
Aug 4, 2024
Merged

Update COMPARED_WITH_PRY.md#984
st0012 merged 1 commit into
ruby:masterfrom
alessandro-fazzi:patch-1

Conversation

@alessandro-fazzi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Document cd object and cd .. commands introduced in 1.14.0 by #971

Comment thread COMPARED_WITH_PRY.md Outdated
| Syntax highlighting | Yes | Yes | |
| Command shell integration | Yes | No | Currently, there's no plan to support such features in IRB |
| Navigation | - `cd object` to enter `object` <br/> - `cd ..` to leave the current object <br/> - `nesting` to list nesting levels | - `pushws object` <br/> - `popws` <br/> - `workspaces` <br /> - `cd object`/`cd ..` (since [1.14.0](https://github.com/ruby/irb/releases/tag/v1.14.0)) | We plan to refine IRB's commands in the future |
| Runtime invocation | `binding.pry` | 👋 IRB is on a mission to match feature parity with Pry. This document is here to help us track the similarities and differences between the two. | |

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think from here and below the table is mixed with other things?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ouch. It's so brutal to me to edit MD tables. 😖 Sorry and thanks. That's fixed.

@alessandro-fazzi alessandro-fazzi force-pushed the patch-1 branch 3 times, most recently from 4ad4bd1 to 844170a Compare August 2, 2024 21:57
Document `cd object` and `cd ..` commands introduced in 1.14.0 by ruby#971

@st0012 st0012 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@st0012 st0012 merged commit b205907 into ruby:master Aug 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

2 participants