Skip to main content
35 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Jun 9 at 16:41 history bounty ended George F
S Jun 9 at 16:41 history notice removed George F
Jun 8 at 12:52 answer added RaySolva timeline score: 2
Jun 7 at 22:24 comment added George F @OldeEnglish I like you, no matter what :)
Jun 7 at 22:22 comment added Olde English @GeorgeF - My "dogmatic" views, as you say, most probably came about as a result of not being prepared to go with the "status quo", the proponents of which have long been all too eager to treat scripture as one big mysterious plot, rather than a truly understandable and informative message. I actually did look at the scriptures with a dubious, although quite probably somewhat exceptional, even translucent, neutral eye and it is because of this approach that I came to see things much more clearly. With all due respect, I suspect that your neutral eye may be somewhat clouded.
Jun 7 at 22:21 answer added George F timeline score: 2
Jun 7 at 19:03 comment added George F @OldeEnglish As a friend, I must say that your dogmatic views surprise me a little. Break away from your dogmatism and look at Scripture with a neutral eye. I also follow this approach myself, because I cannot be sure for everything.
Jun 7 at 17:49 comment added Olde English @GeorgeF - +1. A good question to be sure. As for an answer, well you could check out the answer I gave to a related Q: hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/55950/… ... where you can see that while the "Alpha and Omega" primarily involves God, as in God Almighty, the expression also refers to Jesus, himself, but not in the same vein.
Jun 4 at 11:22 comment added George F I deleted my unnecessary comments
Jun 4 at 5:16 answer added Revelation Lad timeline score: 1
Jun 4 at 0:20 history edited George F CC BY-SA 4.0
change to previous question
Jun 4 at 0:15 history edited George F CC BY-SA 4.0
change to previous question
Jun 3 at 23:48 history reopened Bagpipes
RaySolva
Nhi
Michael16
Dieter
Jun 3 at 23:48 history edited Dieter CC BY-SA 4.0
Rewrote the question to separate it from the Alpha and Omega idiom.
Jun 2 at 16:24 comment added RaySolva I feel that I have something on the question matter to address, and would like to do so, if it be opened and I find my span for doing that. Voted for reopen.
Jun 2 at 6:02 review Reopen votes
Jun 3 at 23:50
Jun 2 at 6:02 history edited George F CC BY-SA 4.0
reformulation of the question
Jun 2 at 1:36 history closed user111403
C. Stroud
agarza
Glory To the Most High
Dottard
Duplicate of What does "Alpha" mean in Revelation 21:6?
S Jun 1 at 16:27 history bounty started George F
S Jun 1 at 16:27 history notice added George F Improve details
May 31 at 2:03 comment added Revelation Lad In addition to the symbolism of first and last, beginning and end, the reason is to validate Scripture in the Greek language. Hebrew has 22 letters; Greek 26. When Jesus says He is the Alpha and Omega, ἐγώ εἰμι τὸ Ἄλφα καὶ τὸ Ὦ He is saying I am the Alpha (the first letter of both the Hebrew and Greek language) and the Ὦ (not the word omega, the letter). There is no Hebrew Ὦ so the Scripture in Greek is divine even though it is not in Hebrew.
May 30 at 22:01 comment added George F @RaySolva I think that this question you are asking has the same underlying meaning. The point is simply that the answer given to this question, although formally correct, does not satisfy me, because I believe that God chose to mention the alphabet for a specific reason. That is the meaning I am looking for. Perhaps the alphabet had a special significance at the time of Christ. Not so much to learn the meaning of the alphabet, that would be too ambitious, but to learn the meaning of the nature of God, and that is what is sought here. A general picture, if possible.
May 30 at 20:49 history edited George F CC BY-SA 4.0
added 159 characters in body
May 30 at 17:02 comment added RaySolva If I got OP's implicit thought process right, the question can be restated as "why did Jesus use alphabet as an illustration for 'first-and-last' sense, and did not use, for example, image of sunrise and sunset, or of birth and death?". If that is the question, I do not find any other to be its duplicate and do not find any reason to close this one.
May 30 at 16:54 comment added RaySolva To prevent closing the question, I suggest to focus on the title question - 'Why does the Lord mention the alphabet?'. That question may be addressed from different angles - primal textual, secondary textual, cultural-historical. +1 for the title question; other subquestions deserve to be clarified in their relation to the main.
May 30 at 16:52 history became hot network question
May 30 at 16:23 answer added Anne timeline score: 2
May 30 at 12:11 comment added Ray Butterworth Perhaps this answers the title question: From A to Z: The Evolving Narrative of Amazon's Logo: "It stretches from the letter ‘a’ to the letter ‘z’, indicating Amazon’s wide product offering—implying that customers can find everything from A to Z on the platform".
May 30 at 10:50 answer added Gina timeline score: 4
May 30 at 9:27 review Close votes
Jun 1 at 16:32
May 30 at 9:21 comment added user111403 So I repeat - which part of your question does it not answer? Specifically, your main question ("why alphabet") is addressed directly by the first paragraph: "The Greek word "alpha" always occurs as part of the phrase "alpha and omega". These are the first and last letters of the Greek alphabet. As such it appears to be a Greek explanation for the very OT Hebrew expression, "First and Last"."
May 30 at 9:19 answer added Dottard timeline score: 4
May 30 at 9:19 comment added George F @user111403 this answer does not answer my question
May 30 at 9:09 comment added user111403 It's not clear which part of this isn't answered by the question and accepted answer here.
May 30 at 8:52 history asked George F CC BY-SA 4.0