Suppose you are an inventor with a patented invention. It is not a software invention but a computer method invention (e.g. the patented object is letan algorithm that solves a computational problem which has practical applications in industry). You log in to a generative AI platform such as Anthropic-Claude, OpenAI-ChatGPT, Alphabet-Gemini or whatever. And there you see that not only your patent appears there (a patent is a public document, so no problem with this) but that the platform is able to implement your algorithm and positively does that (I mean you ask the platform to implement the algorithm in the patent and it does it). In my view this second thing, the fact that the generative AI platform software implements the algorithm under the request of the user is a clear patent infringement, first from the generative AI platform side and second from the user side.
My question is:
Am I right to think that this situation implies two patent infringements from both the AI platform and the user of the platform? The platform is earning money implementing the algorithm, as he sells subscriptions to the platform. And the user might use the implementation of the algorithm to earn money.
I have seen a lot of legal commentary regarding the use of copyrighted material by generative AI platforms (I know the corresponding sentences and some cases related with this), but very little (close to nothing) regarding patents' use (that is a software implementation of the patented algorithms) by generative AI platforms and their users. Maybe this is because in the case of patented materials, the situation is already clear (there is infringement and the fact that this infringement is done through a generative AI platform changes nothing) or because most patents are about physical objects, that can not (yet ) be produced by these platforms.