3
$\begingroup$

Three circles intersect each other as shown. three circles intersecting, with two chords drawn

Prove that the three common chords are concurrent.

Now the book does this by proving that the chord out of E and through M is the same for circle (2) and circle (3) which is very easy to show by using the intersecting chord theorem. However, why does this imply that all three chords are concurrent at M?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ That implies the line $EM$ meets circle (2) and circle (3) at the same point other then $E$. $\endgroup$ Commented May 10, 2019 at 3:22
  • $\begingroup$ You are right: invoking the intersecting chords theorem alone cannot give the proof. See here for a rigorous proof: cut-the-knot.org/triangle/remarkable.shtml#radical. $\endgroup$ Commented May 10, 2019 at 9:28

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

You can prove this fact with the Power of a point.

###Theorem: Power of a point Let $\omega$ be a circle centered at $O$ with radius $r$ and let $P$ be an arbitrary point. We denote the power of $P$ regarding $\omega$ with $\text{Pow}_\omega(P)$. Consider now three cases

  • $P\in\omega\implies \text{Pow}_\omega(P)=0$
  • $P$ lies insider $\omega$

image1

Then $$\begin{align*}\text{Pow}_\omega(P)&=\color{blue}{\vert BP\vert \cdot \vert PA\vert}\\&=\color{#A0F}{\vert DP\vert \cdot \vert PC\vert}\\ &=\color{fuchsia}{\vert EP\vert\cdot \vert PF\vert=\vert(r-\vert PO\vert)\cdot (r+\vert PO\vert)\vert}\\&=\color{fuchsia}{\vert r^2-\vert PO\vert ^2\vert}\end{align*}$$

  • $P$ lies outside $\omega$

img2

Then $$\begin{align*}\text{Pow}_\omega(P)&=\color{#A0F}{\vert PD\vert \cdot \vert PC\vert} \\&=\color{blue}{\vert PT\vert^2}\\ &=\color{fuchsia}{\vert PE\vert\cdot \vert PF\vert=\vert(\vert PO\vert- r)\cdot (\vert PO\vert +r)\vert}\\&=\color{fuchsia}{\vert\vert PO\vert^2-r^2\vert} \end{align*}$$

In general $\:$ $\fbox{$\text{Pow}_\omega(P)=\vert\vert PO\vert^2-r^2\vert$}$


Observation: 1. The converse of a point is also true.

Observation: 2. Some authors prefer to distinguish among positive and negative powers of a point.


Now we introduce a new concept.

Given two circles $\omega_1$ and $\omega_2$, the radical axis is the set of points $P$, such that

$$\text{Pow}_{\omega_1}(P)=\text{Pow}_{\omega_2}(P)$$

Now prove the following claim

If $\omega_1$ and $\omega_2$ intersect at two points, then the radical axis is the line connecting these points.


Back to your example, observe that $DC$ is the radical axis of the circles $(1)$ and $(3)$. Hence $$\text{Pow}_{(1)}M=\text{Pow}_{(3)}M$$

Similarly, $AB$ is the radical axis of circles $(1)$ and $(2)$. We, therefore, infer that $$\text{Pow}_{(1)}M=\text{Pow}_{(2)}M$$ Considering these last equations we arrive at the desired conclusion that $$\text{Pow}_{(2)}M=\text{Pow}_{(3)}M$$ Thus, $M$ lies also on the radicual axis of the circles $(2)$ and $(3)$, i.e. the chords concur at $M$.

Observation: 3. A similar argument is used in order to prove that the perpendicular bisectors of a triangle concur at the circumcentre.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.