0
$\begingroup$

Consider the number of ways to ordered partition an integer $x > 4$ into $x-4$ ones and $2$ twos. In each of these partitions, we want to split them into at least two groups such that the sum of each group is the same. For example, for $x=8$, we can split the ordered partition $\lbrace 2,2,1,1,1,1 \rbrace$ into $\lbrace (2,2),(1,1,1,1) \rbrace$ as both groups have the same sum.

We want to find all $x$ such that it is possible to do this for all possible ordered partitions of $x$ in this manner.

Through brute force, I found the first example that works is $x=6$. Clearly $x$ cannot be prime. I suspect that it is only possible for $x$ that can only be prime factorized as the product of distinct primes, such as $6 = 2 \times 3, 30 = 2 \times 3 \times 5, \ldots$ as these are immune to a two "blocking" a factor. This is why $x=8$ does not work, since the arrangement $\lbrace 2,1,2,1,1,1 \rbrace$ prevents a factor of $4$ or $2$ from occurring.

Any suggestions or thoughts are appreciated. Perhaps as a prime number gets big enough, the number of $2$'s will not matter. It may also not work for prime powers as well.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Is it necessary that there are two groups, or can there be $3$ groups, each adding up to $x//3?$ $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 23 at 17:11
  • $\begingroup$ @ThomasAndrews "at least 2" will include the possibility of 3 groups. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 23 at 17:40
  • $\begingroup$ if there were only two, that would trivialize the problem, wouldn't it $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 23 at 17:54
  • $\begingroup$ USAMTS Year 37 Round 2 $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 3 at 15:24

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.