5
$\begingroup$

I have a question on the following proof, that $\delta_0$ is not a regular distribution. We define $\delta_0$ as the linear function on test function with $$ \delta_0(\varphi) = \varphi(0) $$ for every test function $\varphi$ (note it is not defined as some function with $\delta(0) = 1, \delta(x) = 0$ for $x \ne 1$, so this property could not be used here).

Proof: Suppose there is a representation $$ \delta_0(\varphi) = \int_{\Omega} f(x) \varphi(x) ~\mathrm dx $$ with a function $f \in L_{\mathrm{loc}}^1(\Omega)$. The restriction of $\delta_0$ on $\Omega\setminus \{ 0 \}$ is the Zero-Distribution, i.e. those distribution that assigns each $\varphi$ the value $0$. Therefore, the function which represents $\delta_0$ is $f \equiv 0$ almost everywhere on $\Omega$, and therefore $\delta_0$ would be the Zero-Distribtion as well. Contradiction. $\square$

The proof could be found here, p. 95 (in german).

My Question: What is the restriction of a distribution? Distribution are linear functionals, so if I restrict the domain, I restrict the set of test functions, but here some subsets, maybe $\Omega \subseteq \mathbb R$, is restricted. And also if I restrict the domain of integration, then the set of test functions is altered too, so who said that if I get a result for some set of test functions, I get the same if I consider another set of test functions?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I don't really know the conventions, but my guess would be that a distribution is a member of $C_c^\infty(\Omega)^*$, while restriction is to $C_c^\infty(\Omega\setminus\{0\})^*$ (by the natural restriction homomorphism). It also seems to make sense in the proof. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 18, 2014 at 11:35
  • $\begingroup$ You can see here also some ideas. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 19, 2014 at 21:02

1 Answer 1

8
$\begingroup$

For $U \subset V$, we have a natural (continuous) injection

$$\iota^U_V \colon \mathscr{D}(U) \hookrightarrow \mathscr{D}(V).$$

Its transpose,

$$\rho^V_U \colon \mathscr{D}'(V) \to \mathscr{D}'(U)$$

is called the restriction of the distributions on $V$ to distributions on $U$. For regular distributions, that corresponds to the restriction of the locally integrable function representing the distribution to $U$.

The fundamental lemma, that for any $f\in L^1_\text{loc} \Omega$ and $W\subset \Omega$ we have

$$\bigl(\forall \varphi \in \mathscr{D}(W)\bigr)\left(\int_W f(x)\varphi(x)\,dx = 0\right) \implies f\lvert_W = 0 \text{ a.e.},$$

makes the two restrictions compatible.

So here, looking at only test functions with support in $\Omega\setminus\{0\}$ yields the result that $f$ would be zero almost everywhere in $\Omega\setminus\{0\}$, hence almost everywhere in $\Omega$.

For an alternative proof that the Dirac distribution is not regular, consider a test function $\varphi\in\mathscr{D}(\Omega)$ with $\varphi(0) = 1$, and note that then

$$1 = \int_\Omega f(x)\varphi(nx)\,dx$$

for all $n\in\mathbb{N}\setminus\{0\}$ violates the dominated convergence theorem.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.