12
$\begingroup$

I have a probably basic question concerning Hilbert cube manifolds. There are already many questions asking very similar things in this forum, but I could not find the particular answer I am looking for.

Let $Q=[0,1]^\omega$ be the Hilbert cube and let $X=Q\setminus\{0\}$ the locally compact space obtained by deleting one point of $Q$. It is clear that $X$ is a contractible non-compact $Q$-manifold, as is $X\times X$.

My question is: Is $X$ homeomorphic to $X\times X$ ?

I know that compact contractible $Q$-manifolds are all homeomorphic, and that the situation is more complicated in the non-compact case. However, since the space $X$ seems like a very "easy" non-compact Hilbert cube manifold, I would expect the answer to be yes, I just could not find the correct reference.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ By $\{0\}$ do you mean the point all of whose coordinates are 0? Because it's not trvially obvious that the structure of $X$ shouldn't depend on how many of the coordinates of the deleted point are endpoints of $[0,1]$. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 21 at 13:56
  • 8
    $\begingroup$ Yes, I meant the point with all coordinates equal to zero. However, it does not matter which point you cut out as the Hilbert cube is homogeneous (which is far from obvious) $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 21 at 14:48

1 Answer 1

13
$\begingroup$

There is an easy answer, based on a non-trivial theorem from Infinite-dimensional Topology. The Hilbert cube $Q$ is homeomorphic to its own cone $C(Q)$, which is $Q\times[0,1]$ with $Q\times\{1\}$ shrunk to a point, $p$ say. By homogeneity your $X$ is the same as $C(Q)\setminus\{p\}$, which is homeomorphic to $Q\times[0,1)$. Now $[0,1)\times[0,1)$ is homeomorphic to $[0,1]\times[0,1)$ (both are a disc with a closed seqment taken out of the boundary circle; draw a picture). It follows that $\bigl(Q\times[0,1)\bigr)^2$ is homeomorphic to $Q^2\times[0,1]\times[0,1)$, which is (homeomorphic to) $Q\times[0,1)$.

For a proof that $C(Q)$ is homeomorphic to $Q$ see section 6.1 of Jan van Mill's book Infinite-dimensional topology. Prerequisites and introduction (pages 254-258).

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Perfect! Thank you very much for this wonderful answer! $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 25 at 18:55
  • $\begingroup$ I just realized that $[0,1)\times Q$ being homeomorphic to $[0,1)^2\times Q$ shows that $[0,1)$ is very different from $\mathbb{R}$ as $\mathbb{R}\times Q$ is not homeomorphic to $\mathbb{R}^2\times Q$ ... (see mathoverflow.net/questions/482483/…) ... So, the argument for $\mathbb{R}$ cannot carry over to $[0,1)$ ... Fascinating... $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 27 at 9:37

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.