Linked Questions

65 votes
4 answers
8k views

I think a related question might be this (Set-Theoretic Issues/Categories). There are many ways in which you can avoid set theoretical paradoxes in dealing with category theory (see for instance ...
jg1896's user avatar
  • 3,846
52 votes
2 answers
7k views

Brian Conrad indicated a while ago that many of the results proven in AG using universes can be proven without them by being very careful (link). I'm wondering if there are any results in AG that ...
Harry Gindi's user avatar
35 votes
6 answers
4k views

As with many of you, I've been following Peter Scholze's recent question about universes with great interest. In ring theory, we don't often have to deal with proper classes, but they occasionally ...
Pace Nielsen's user avatar
  • 20.2k
45 votes
3 answers
4k views

I recently learned that some parts of SGA require axioms beyond ZFC. I am just a simple algebraic geometer so I am trying to understand how can this fact impact my life (you may have engaged in a ...
user avatar
25 votes
2 answers
4k views

Preface: I am not an expert in the work of Scholze, or anything for that matter. Question Has Scholze stated what axioms he is using to develop his theory of motives and analytic geometry. In the ...
Rilem's user avatar
  • 485
17 votes
2 answers
2k views

I have been a user of category theory for a long time. I recently started studying a rigorous treatment of categories within ZFC+U. Then I become suspecting the effect of the smallness of sets. We ...
LOCOAS's user avatar
  • 445
12 votes
4 answers
2k views

(This question was posted on math.SE over two weeks ago, but received no answer. I am therefore posting it here as well.) It is well-known that there are difficulties in developing basic category ...
Asaf Karagila's user avatar
  • 42.3k
22 votes
1 answer
4k views

As far as I know, whether Fermat's Last Theorem is provable in Peano Arithmetic is an open problem. What is known about this problem? In particular, what is known about the arithmetic systems $PA + \...
Christopher King's user avatar
13 votes
3 answers
1k views

One axiomatisation of set theory, the Elementary Theory of the Category of Sets, or ETCS for short, comes from category theory and states that sets and functions form a locally cartesian-closed, ...
user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
1k views

Is the following correct? If something is provable for small sets in ZFC with Axiom of Universes ("For any set x, there exists a universe U such that x∈U.") then it is provable for any sets in ZFC (...
porton's user avatar
  • 781
14 votes
1 answer
1k views

In what follows, $\mathsf{ZCKP}$ refers to the subset of $\mathsf{ZFC}$ consisting of the axioms of Zermelo set theory with choice and foundation ($\mathsf{ZC}$) plus those of Kripke-Platek set theory ...
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 41k
10 votes
1 answer
1k views

I'm trying to understand what the claimed practical benefits of HTT/univalent foundations are for doing computer assisted proofs and while I've seen a lot of claims of benefits they all seem to be ...
Peter Gerdes's user avatar
  • 4,079
5 votes
2 answers
486 views

When one starts with a locally small category $\mathcal{C}$ and wants to localize it at an appropriate choosen collection of morphisms $\mathcal{W}$, then in general one faces some size issues in the ...
user267839's user avatar
  • 4,246
11 votes
1 answer
949 views

I'm getting a bit lost over at Peter Scholze's interesting question about removing the dependence on universes from theorems in category theory. In particular, I'm being forced to admit that I don't ...
Tim Campion's user avatar
  • 68.1k
11 votes
0 answers
480 views

This question was prompted by a discussion from another MO question about the consistency of ZFC. There are some mathematicians who are comfortable with ZFC but uneasy with large cardinals. For them,...
Timothy Chow's user avatar
  • 92.3k

15 30 50 per page