Linked Questions

Ask Question
24 questions linked to/from Empowering tag-badge holders part II - let's look at silver?
Hot Newest Score Active Unanswered
252 votes
81 answers
21k views

In case you missed the first one, check out the se-quality-project tag. The quality project isn't one that we plan to ever finish, it's perennial and kicks in every 18 months or so after we've had ...
user avatar
169 votes
47 answers
9k views

The last time we lifted the level cap was in 2015. In 2014, we added a unilateral close-as-duplicate power for gold tag badge holders, but no new reputation level. So we've been thinking about giving ...
Jon Ericson's user avatar
  • 81.1k
105 votes
39 answers
15k views

Update 2 (March 6, 23) We made a shortlist of the most promising suggestions from the answers provided, and we then shared our findings with Philippe Beaudette, our VP of Community. After some ...
Hoid's user avatar
  • 14.3k
366 votes
16 answers
10k views

The difference between a poor or meh question and a stellar question can often simply be someone understanding it and providing it a great answer. I can't begin to count the number of times I've ...
user avatar
175 votes
25 answers
6k views

Today, the size of the close-votes queue is 55k questions and growing. Is that a problem? Which action could be taken to clean it up? It seems to be growing faster than Stack Overflow members ...
Andriy's user avatar
  • 1,873
163 votes
14 answers
4k views

A worryingly high number of bad suggested edits get accepted. For example: edits that add bad formatting to random words edits that break the formatting of a block of code edits that add wrong tags ...
Gilles 'SO- stop being evil''s user avatar
  • 110k
268 votes
5 answers
15k views

In order to increase the efficiency with which poor quality questions are closed, it could make sense to have weighted close votes for a small subset of qualified users. A very good way to measure ...
Travis J's user avatar
  • 34k
56 votes
21 answers
2k views

In Q3 2021 I finalized my research around three vote close/reopen and I was pretty happy with the outcomes - as were the sites that got to test it out. While the benefit to each site was different, ...
Catija's user avatar
  • 117k
77 votes
12 answers
2k views

When we were working on the last se-quality-project, I wanted to introduce something into the review system that I still feel is pretty lacking. There's no way to really track your efficacy as a ...
user avatar
70 votes
12 answers
2k views

This is one of three project announcements for Improving Review Queues. We’ve summarized the project objectives and goals here. As a reminder, this project is still in the early stages of discovery. ...
Lisa Park's user avatar
  • 10.1k
177 votes
6 answers
3k views

Questions are the lifeblood of any Stack Exchange site. But asking good questions can be difficult, and while most people start off doing it poorly, some never get better. For years now, when sites ...
Shog9's user avatar
  • 458k
81 votes
6 answers
2k views

There have been several proposals for how we’re ever going to get a handle on the ever-mounting close-vote queue. Dupehammer has been especially successful, and there have been several proposals ...
tchrist's user avatar
  • 13.4k
22 votes
7 answers
733 views

This is just an FYI: I've just published the Q4 2021 Community team roadmap on the blog (and it's early, even!). I'm taking questions or comments here, or over there. :-)
Philippe's user avatar
  • 24.7k
35 votes
4 answers
998 views

I'm calling it a Closehammer rather than an Onholdhammer because... well, just look at how odd Onholdhammer looks. I'm proposing that trusted users be given the ability to instantly place a question ...
user avatar
-14 votes
5 answers
986 views

Summary If bad AI content gets upvoted, can we use that as an opportunity to understand & improve our voting system? Should we focus more on the fact that bad AI content is bad, and not that it ...
Julius Hamilton's user avatar
  • 538

15 30 50 per page
1
2