nLab initial object (changes)

Showing changes from revision #43 to #44: | Removed | Chan

Context

Category theory

Limits and colimits

Contents

Definition

\begin{definition} An initial object in a category π’ž\mathcal{C} is an object βˆ…\emptyset such that for all objects xβˆˆπ’žx \,\in\, \mathcal{C}, there is a unique morphism βˆ…β†’βˆƒ!x\varnothing \xrightarrow{\exists !} x with source βˆ…\varnothing. and target xx. \end{definition}

\begin{remark} An initial object, if it exists, is unique up to unique isomorphism, so that we may speak of the initial object. \end{remark}

\begin{remark}\label{InitialObjectIsEmptyColimit} When it exists, the initial object is the colimit over the empty diagram. \end{remark}

\begin{remark} Initial objects are also called coterminal, and (rarely, though): coterminators, universal initial, co-universal, or simply universal. \end{remark}

\begin{definition} An initial object βˆ…\varnothing is called a strict initial object if all morphisms xβ†’βˆ…x \xrightarrow{\;} \varnothing into it are isomorphisms.
\end{definition}

\begin{remark} Initial objects are the dual concept to terminal objects: an initial object in CC is the same as a terminal object in the opposite category C opC^{op}.
\end{remark}

\begin{remark} An object that is both initial and terminal is called a zero object. \end{remark}

Examples

Properties

Left adjoints to constant functors

\begin{proposition} \label{AdjointsToConstantFunctors} Let π’ž\mathcal{C} be a category.

  1. The following are equivalent:

    1. π’ž\mathcal{C} has a terminal object;

    2. the unique functor π’žβ†’*\mathcal{C} \to \ast to the terminal category has a right adjoint

      *βŠ₯βŸΆβŸ΅π’ž \ast \underoverset {\underset{}{\longrightarrow}} {\overset{}{\longleftarrow}} {\bot} \mathcal{C}

    Under this equivalence, the terminal object is identified with the image under the right adjoint of the unique object of the terminal category.

  2. Dually, the following are equivalent:

    1. π’ž\mathcal{C} has an initial object;

    2. the unique functor π’žβ†’*\mathcal{C} \to \ast to the terminal category has a left adjoint

      π’žβŠ₯⟢⟡* \mathcal{C} \underoverset {\underset{}{\longrightarrow}} {\overset{}{\longleftarrow}} {\bot} \ast

    Under this equivalence, the initial object is identified with the image under the left adjoint of the unique object of the terminal category.

\end{proposition}

Proof

Since the unique hom-set in the terminal category is the singleton, the hom-isomorphism characterizing the adjoint functors is directly the universal property of an initial object in π’ž\mathcal{C}

Hom π’ž(L(*),X)≃Hom *(*,R(X))=* Hom_{\mathcal{C}}( L(\ast) , X ) \;\simeq\; Hom_{\ast}( \ast, R(X) ) = \ast

or of a terminal object

Hom π’ž(X,R(*))≃Hom *(L(X),*)=*, Hom_{\mathcal{C}}( X , R(\ast) ) \;\simeq\; Hom_{\ast}( L(X), \ast ) = \ast \,,

respectively.

Cones over the identity

By definition, an initial object is equipped with a universal cocone under the unique functor βˆ…β†’C\emptyset\to C from the empty category. On the other hand, if II is initial, the unique morphisms !:Iβ†’x!: I \to x form a cone over the identity functor, i.e. a natural transformation Ξ”Iβ†’Id C\Delta I \to Id_C from the constant functor at the initial object to the identity functor. In fact this is almost another characterization of an initial object (e.g. MacLane, p. 229-230):

Lemma

Suppose I∈CI\in C is an object equipped with a natural transformation p:Ξ”Iβ†’Id Cp:\Delta I \to Id_C such that p I=1 I:Iβ†’Ip_I = 1_I : I\to I. Then II is an initial object of CC.

Proof

Obviously II has at least one morphism to every other object X∈CX\in C, namely p Xp_X, so it suffices to show that any f:Iβ†’Xf:I\to X must be equal to p Xp_X. But the naturality of pp implies that Id C(f)∘p I=p Xβˆ˜Ξ” I(f)\Id_C(f) \circ p_I = p_X \circ \Delta_I(f), and since p I=1 Ip_I = 1_I this is to say f∘1 I=p X∘1 If \circ 1_I = p_X \circ 1_I, i.e. f=p Xf=p_X as desired.

Theorem

An object II in a category CC is initial iff II is the limit of the identity functor Id CId_C.

Proof

If II is initial, then there is a cone (! X:Iβ†’X) X∈Ob(C)(!_X: I \to X)_{X \in Ob(C)} from II to Id CId_C. If (p X:Aβ†’X) X∈Ob(C)(p_X: A \to X)_{X \in Ob(C)} is any cone from AA to Id CId_C, then p X=f∘p Yp_X = f \circ p_Y for any f:Yβ†’Xf:Y\to X, and so in particular p X=! X∘p Ip_X = !_X \circ p_I. Since this is true for any XX, p I:Aβ†’Ip_I: A \to I defines a morphism of cones, and it is the unique morphism of cones since if qq is any morphism of cones, then p I=! I∘q=1 I∘q=qp_I = !_I \circ q = 1_I \circ q = q (using that ! I=1 I!_I = 1_I by initiality). Thus (! X:Iβ†’X) X∈Ob(C)(!_X: I \to X)_{X \in Ob(C)} is the limit cone.

Conversely, if (p X:Lβ†’X) X∈Ob(C)(p_X: L \to X)_{X \in Ob(C)} is a limit cone for Id CId_C, then f∘p Y=p Xf\circ p_Y = p_X for any f:Yβ†’Xf:Y\to X, and so in particular p X∘p L=p Xp_X \circ p_L = p_X for all XX. This means that both p L:Lβ†’Lp_L: L \to L and 1 L:Lβ†’L1_L: L \to L define morphisms of cones; since the limit cone is the terminal cone, we infer p L=1 Lp_L = 1_L. Then by Lemma 1 we conclude LL is initial.

Remark

(relevance for adjoint functor theorem)

Theorem 1 is actually a key of entry into the general adjoint functor theorem. Showing that a functor G:Cβ†’DG: C \to D has a left adjoint is tantamount to showing that each functor D(d,Gβˆ’)D(d, G-) is representable, i.e., that the comma category d↓Gd \downarrow G has an initial object (c,ΞΈ:dβ†’Gc)(c, \theta: d \to G c) (see at adjoint functor, this prop.). This is the limit of the identity functor, but typically this is the limit over a large diagram whose existence is not guaranteed. The point of a solution set condition is to replace this with a small diagram which is cofinal in the large diagram.

References

Textbook accounts:

Last revised on April 11, 2025 at 10:11:20. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.