Skip to main content

Questions tagged [transcendental-idealism]

6 votes
3 answers
416 views

I have been brought to this question by a reading of the first parts of the Husserlian "Prolegomena" in Logical Investigations Vol. 1. Therein Husserl undertakes a discussion of conceptions ...
DanielFBest's user avatar
  • 1,630
5 votes
0 answers
105 views

In the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant once expressed his synthetic principle in such a manner: "The synthetic proposition, that every different empirical consciousness must be combined into a ...
l1chtungl1's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
187 views

I can't seem to grasp how transcendental philosophers like Kant or Husserl (or even Descartes) can claim objectivity for their claims? It seems to me as a broader problem (of knowledge) of other minds....
Asketa's user avatar
  • 31
6 votes
4 answers
2k views

Kant draws a dividing line between phenomena, which are perceptions that are formed through our senses after the mind organizes them, and noumena, which is “reality in itself” that remains elusive to ...
Lwa Dua's user avatar
  • 69
3 votes
1 answer
309 views

For Kant, the "transcendent", is that which lies beyond what our faculty of knowledge can legitimately know. Hegel's counter-argument to Kant was that to know a boundary is also to be aware ...
TheMatrix Equation-balance's user avatar
4 votes
4 answers
529 views

So here are some quotes from Schopenhauer about Kant's views: "Transcendental is the philosophy that makes us aware of the fact that the first and essential laws of this world that are presented ...
MrJ's user avatar
  • 41
-1 votes
2 answers
184 views

Is the transcendental idealism compatible with panpsychism, The view that all things have consciousness?
Angotpf's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
134 views

I am working (slowly) through the Critique of Pure Reason, reading Sebastian Gardner's Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kant and the Critique of Pure Reason as a secondary source (among others), and ...
Conan G.'s user avatar
  • 211
1 vote
1 answer
153 views

i have been interested in "the problem of affection" in Transcendental Idealism for a while now and a possible solution came to my mind, Kant says that TIT Causes our Phenomena as if TIT (...
Parsa Fakhar's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
143 views

I am currently reading through Immanuel Kant: Key Concepts, edited by Dudley and Engelhard, in preparation for tackling the Prolomegna and (possibly) the Critique of Pure Reason, and I am a bit stuck ...
Conan G.'s user avatar
  • 211
4 votes
3 answers
250 views

i'm simply testing this out the "problem of affection" in kant happens because kant says causality is an apriori knowledge can't we just say, thing-in-itself gives us "causality" ...
Parsa Fakhar's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
335 views

We all know "the problem of affection" raised by Schulze: "if causality is apriori structure of the mind and exist inside the mind, how can we claim thing-in-themselves cause phenomena ...
Parsa Fakhar's user avatar
6 votes
5 answers
682 views

This question is about Scott F. Aikin's 2017 paper "Modest (but not Self-Effacing) Transcendental Arguments". The full paper is accessible here with a free account, and some ideas regarding ...
viuser's user avatar
  • 5,651
4 votes
1 answer
120 views

Kant rendered the judgments of reason as subjective, neither narrating nor accurately reflecting the reality of things. "We only sense from external objects, thus perception does not express ...
user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
156 views

In the introduction to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason by Marcus Weigelt, Weigelt writes, "Reason, although sometimes understood as the faculty that encompasses all thought (for instance when we ...
Aditya Verma's user avatar

15 30 50 per page