Skip to main content
Physics

Return to Question

Post Timeline

tried to make title/question better
Source Link
Qmechanic ♦
Qmechanic ♦
  • 226.5k
  • 52
  • 651
  • 2.7k

What observational constraints rule out rₛ$r_s = 2R2R$ as a cosmological postulate?

A geometric model I've been studying derives cosmological parameters from the postulate that the Schwarzschild radius equals twice the cosmic radius at all scales (rₛ = 2R$r_s = 2R$). It claims to resolve the Hubble tension via a time dilation factor γ(z) = √(2z+1), fit rotation curves without dark matter, and interpret the CMB as boundary radiation.

The preprint is at DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19296662https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19296662.

What are the strongest existing observational constraints that would test or falsify this class of model?

What observational constraints rule out rₛ = 2R as a cosmological postulate?

A geometric model I've been studying derives cosmological parameters from the postulate that the Schwarzschild radius equals twice the cosmic radius at all scales (rₛ = 2R). It claims to resolve the Hubble tension via a time dilation factor γ(z) = √(2z+1), fit rotation curves without dark matter, and interpret the CMB as boundary radiation.

The preprint is at DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19296662.

What are the strongest existing observational constraints that would test or falsify this class of model?

What observational constraints rule out $r_s = 2R$ as a cosmological postulate?

A geometric model I've been studying derives cosmological parameters from the postulate that the Schwarzschild radius equals twice the cosmic radius at all scales ($r_s = 2R$). It claims to resolve the Hubble tension via a time dilation factor γ(z) = √(2z+1), fit rotation curves without dark matter, and interpret the CMB as boundary radiation.

The preprint is at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19296662.

What are the strongest existing observational constraints that would test or falsify this class of model?

Post Closed as "Needs details or clarity" by Buzz♦
Source Link
Sean Myers
Sean Myers
  • 1

What observational constraints rule out rₛ = 2R as a cosmological postulate?

A geometric model I've been studying derives cosmological parameters from the postulate that the Schwarzschild radius equals twice the cosmic radius at all scales (rₛ = 2R). It claims to resolve the Hubble tension via a time dilation factor γ(z) = √(2z+1), fit rotation curves without dark matter, and interpret the CMB as boundary radiation.

The preprint is at DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19296662.

What are the strongest existing observational constraints that would test or falsify this class of model?