It is better (accurate and cleaner) if you use a different variable.
for i in range (1,20):
n = i
if i%3==0 and i%4==0:
n=i+12
if i%3==0:
n=i+3
if i%4==0:
n=i+4
print n
Now you will notice this fixed it for the 9 case, but not the 12 case! We now need to add the use of elif
. Also, if a number is a multiple of 3 and 4, then it is also a multiple of their lowest common multiple, in this case 12. So you could re-write your first step to just check for multiples of 12. This gives us:
for i in range (1,20):
n = i
if i%12==0
n=i+12 # or possibly i + i
elif i%3==0:
n=i+3
elif i%4==0:
n=i+4
print n
The reason this works is because without the elif
the i was getting added to multiple times. For example, with 9, you get to 9%3 ==0
, True. Now i is set to 12. Next statement? 12%4 ==0
True. So another 4 is added.
Alternatively, if you would like to do some crazy python stuff:
for i in range(1, 20):
print i + next((n for n in (12, 4, 3) if i % n == 0), 0)
(Shout out to Jon Clements for this 2-liner answer)
+=
syntax as well. Instead ofi=i+4
, you could usei+=4
. It'll make it cleaner.