The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20131002215013/http://mathworld.wolfram.com/HappyEndProblem.html

Happy End Problem

DOWNLOAD Mathematica Notebook HappyEndProblem

The happy end problem, also called the "happy ending problem," is the problem of determining for n>=3 the smallest number of points g(n) in general position in the plane (i.e., no three of which are collinear), such that every possible arrangement of g(n) points will always contain at least one set of n points that are the vertices of a convex polygon of n sides. The problem was so-named by Erdős when two investigators who first worked on the problem, Ester Klein and George Szekeres, became engaged and subsequently married (Hoffman 1998, p. 76).

Since three noncollinear points always determine a triangle, g(3)=3.

HappyEndProblem4

Random arrangements of n=4 points are illustrated above. Note that no quadrilaterals are possible for the arrangements shown in the fifth and eighth figures above, so g(4) must be greater than 4. E. Klein proved that g(4)=5 by showing that any arrangement of five points must fall into one of the three cases (left top figure; Hoffman 1998, pp. 75-76).

HappyEndProblem8

Random arrangements of n=8 points are illustrated above. Note that no pentagons are possible for the arrangement shown in the fifth figure above, so g(5) must be greater than 8. E. Makai proved g(5)=9 after demonstrating that a counterexample could be found for eight points (right top figure; Hoffman 1998, pp. 75-76).

As the number of points n increases, the number of k-subsets of n that must be examined to see if they form convex k-gons increases as (n; k), so combinatorial explosion prevents cases much bigger than n=5 from being easily studied. Furthermore, the parameter space become so large that searching for a counterexample at random even for the case n=6 with k=12 points takes an extremely long time. For these reasons, the general problem remains open.

g(6)=17 was demonstrated by Szekeres and Peters (2006) using a computer search which eliminated all possible configurations of 17 points which lacked convex hexagons while examining only a tiny fraction of all configurations.

Erdős and Szekeres (1935) showed that g(n) always exists and derived the bound

 2^(n-2)+1<=g(n)<=(2n-4; n-2)+1,
(1)

where (n; k) is a binomial coefficient. For n>=4, this has since been reduced to g(n)<=g_1(n) for

 g_1(n)=(2n-4; n-2)
(2)

by Chung and Graham (1998), g(n)<=g_2(n) for

 g_2(n)=(2n-4; n-2)+7-2n
(3)

by Kleitman and Pachter (1998), and g(n)<=g_3(n) for

 g_3(n)=(2n-5; n-2)+2
(4)

by Tóth and Valtr (1998). For g(6), these bounds give 71, 70, 65, and 37, respectively (Hoffman 1998, p. 78).

The values of g_3(n) for n=6, 7, ... are 37, 128, 464, 1718, ... (Sloane's A052473).

Wolfram Web Resources

Mathematica »

The #1 tool for creating Demonstrations and anything technical.

Wolfram|Alpha »

Explore anything with the first computational knowledge engine.

Wolfram Demonstrations Project »

Explore thousands of free applications across science, mathematics, engineering, technology, business, art, finance, social sciences, and more.

Computable Document Format »

The format that makes Demonstrations (and any information) easy to share and interact with.

STEM initiative »

Programs & resources for educators, schools & students.

Computerbasedmath.org »

Join the initiative for modernizing math education.