Happy End Problem
The happy end problem, also called the "happy ending problem," is the problem of determining for
the smallest number of points
in general position
in the plane (i.e., no three of which are collinear),
such that every possible arrangement of
points will
always contain at least one set of
points that are
the vertices of a convex polygon of
sides. The problem
was so-named by Erdős when two investigators who first worked on the problem,
Ester Klein and George Szekeres, became engaged and subsequently married (Hoffman
1998, p. 76).
Since three noncollinear points always determine a triangle,
.
Random arrangements of
points are illustrated above. Note
that no quadrilaterals are possible for the arrangements shown in the fifth and eighth
figures above, so
must be greater than 4. E. Klein
proved that
by showing that any arrangement
of five points must fall into one of the three cases (left top figure; Hoffman 1998,
pp. 75-76).
Random arrangements of
points are illustrated
above. Note that no pentagons are possible for the arrangement shown in the fifth
figure above, so
must be greater than 8. E. Makai
proved
after demonstrating that a counterexample
could be found for eight points (right top figure; Hoffman 1998, pp. 75-76).
As the number of points
increases, the
number of
-subsets of
that must be examined
to see if they form convex
-gons increases
as
, so combinatorial explosion prevents
cases much bigger than
from being easily
studied. Furthermore, the parameter space become so large that searching for a counterexample
at random even for the case
with
points takes
an extremely long time. For these reasons, the general problem remains open.
was demonstrated by Szekeres and Peters (2006)
using a computer search which eliminated all possible configurations of 17 points
which lacked convex hexagons while examining only a tiny fraction of all configurations.
Erdős and Szekeres (1935) showed that
always exists
and derived the bound
|
(1)
|
where
is a binomial
coefficient. For
, this has since been reduced to
for
|
(2)
|
by Chung and Graham (1998),
for
|
(3)
|
by Kleitman and Pachter (1998), and
for
|
(4)
|
by Tóth and Valtr (1998). For
, these bounds
give 71, 70, 65, and 37, respectively (Hoffman 1998, p. 78).
The values of
for
, 7, ... are
37, 128, 464, 1718, ... (Sloane's A052473).


Bode plot of s/(1-s) sampling period .02