Skip to main content
38 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 27, 2021 at 0:18 answer added Loren Pechtel timeline score: 1
Sep 26, 2021 at 18:40 answer added Demigan timeline score: 0
Sep 26, 2021 at 11:47 answer added user90413 timeline score: 1
Sep 24, 2021 at 18:47 comment added Nat You're meta-aware, so you follow the Villain's First Rule.
Sep 24, 2021 at 15:18 answer added Daniel J. timeline score: 0
Sep 24, 2021 at 14:33 answer added Jontia timeline score: 3
Sep 24, 2021 at 13:57 comment added Issel These weak points were not obvious hundreds of years ago, but villagers are smarter, and are familiar with these minions now. These minions are basic and cheap for a villian to raise and control. You ever see side by side comparisons of olympic athletes today and from 100 years ago? The average person is just a lot smarter and have better tools and tactics than 200 hundred years ago.
Sep 24, 2021 at 11:04 answer added AncientSwordRage timeline score: 1
Sep 23, 2021 at 18:50 vote accept LiveInAmbeR
Sep 23, 2021 at 17:36 comment added jamesqf Because video game developers want to sell lots of video games. (And internal merchandizing &c.) If the players always get wiped out in the first level, the game will not be popular.
Sep 23, 2021 at 16:56 comment added BruceWayne What do you define as a "weak point"? Humans, I'd say, have a monstrous weak point, in that our entire Central Nervous System runs through a relatively thinly protected neck (I can very easily touch the back of my neck and feel my spine under the skin). But, where else would "we" route that? It's kind of required, based on our physical makeup. Perhaps your minions are similar in that way?
Sep 23, 2021 at 15:41 answer added Nuclear241 timeline score: 4
Sep 23, 2021 at 14:58 answer added Blindy timeline score: 1
Sep 23, 2021 at 13:13 answer added Pavel Stepanov timeline score: 1
Sep 23, 2021 at 13:04 comment added Nuclear241 I feel very strong urge to utter "developer oversight"..
Sep 23, 2021 at 11:42 comment added Kaddath Aaaargh you forgot the usual TVTropes warning! just lost almost an hour before realizing what happened :D funny list BTW
Sep 23, 2021 at 4:21 answer added Corey timeline score: 16
Sep 23, 2021 at 2:55 answer added Jedediah timeline score: 4
Sep 22, 2021 at 23:17 answer added Charlie Bamford timeline score: 32
Sep 22, 2021 at 23:13 comment added LiveInAmbeR @Alendyias These are all very sound comments. I already mentioned in the OP that monsters are only as good as how well they defend their weak point. What is being asked is why that weak point would be made visible.
Sep 22, 2021 at 22:56 comment added Alendyias This would make monsters with weak points viable despite weak points, and should be just plain common sense on the part of Overlord's Monster Design Department.
Sep 22, 2021 at 22:55 comment added Alendyias For example, you could place a weak point in a hard-to-reach spot on the monster (belly of the beast anyone?), give the weak point some form of protection that must be destroyed, removed, or worked around, or else spread the vulnerability so that a larger area is vulnerable to damage, but less damage will result from it being struck overall (enlarge the weak point, diminish it as a vulnerability accordingly).
Sep 22, 2021 at 22:53 comment added Alendyias Going off the evolutionary standpoint and the excellent answers here, maybe it'd be smart to minimize the weak points.
Sep 22, 2021 at 21:41 answer added Nepene Nep timeline score: 8
Sep 22, 2021 at 21:29 history edited jdunlop CC BY-SA 4.0
added 4 characters in body; edited title
Sep 22, 2021 at 21:08 answer added Mark timeline score: 11
Sep 22, 2021 at 21:06 answer added Josh Part timeline score: 53
Sep 22, 2021 at 20:49 answer added Davislor timeline score: 60
Sep 22, 2021 at 20:40 comment added LiveInAmbeR @JohnO Yeah sure, the evil overlord CREATING the monsters can always blame it on evolution. That seems like a perfectly evil thing to do. Shifting the blame like a champ.
Sep 22, 2021 at 20:31 comment added John O Biology/evolution have given all of us such weaknesses. They weren't intentional, just the result of adaptivity not ever having encountered such an issue before. Why waste resources on some subtle/narrow magic power that as far as the villain is concerned, doesn't even exist? Imho you don't need an explanation for this as long as those weaknesses aren't absurd. I mean, there are people who die if they nibble peanut butter, so making those absurd enough to be a problem would actually be challenging.
Sep 22, 2021 at 20:23 answer added Nosajimiki timeline score: 85
Sep 22, 2021 at 19:31 history became hot network question
Sep 22, 2021 at 12:17 comment added Pelinore A big "red x"? well no it doesn't, you wouldn't want to advertise your kill switch, that would just be silly :)
Sep 22, 2021 at 12:16 answer added Willk timeline score: 21
Sep 22, 2021 at 12:15 comment added LiveInAmbeR @Pelinore I have when writing the question. It still doesn't explain why the minions brandish a big "red x" for enemies to aim.
Sep 22, 2021 at 11:43 comment added Pelinore Are you looking for a reason why any sane minion 'employer' would always include such a weakness? have you considered the kill switch rationale? always have a way to kill your minions quickly if they ever turn on you? (so paranoia then is the reason).
Sep 22, 2021 at 11:40 answer added L.Dutch timeline score: 4
Sep 22, 2021 at 11:28 history asked LiveInAmbeR CC BY-SA 4.0