Independent WordPress & Server Security

Independent WordPress Security: Audits, Malware Removal, and Server Hardening

Independent security audits, hardening, malware remediation, and authorized penetration testing for WordPress websites and Linux web servers.

NDA available
Written authorization required for testing
Never send credentials through this website

9
YEARS
200+
ENGAGEMENTS
4.8/5
RATING
CompTIA
CERTIFIED

What gets assessed

  • 01DNS / TLSASSESS
  • 02CDN / WAFASSESS
  • 03LINUX / NGINX / APACHEHARDEN
  • 04PHP / DATABASEHARDEN
  • 05WORDPRESS / PLUGINS / THEMESASSESS
  • 06USERS / AUTH / BUSINESS LOGICVERIFY
HIGH SAMPLE FINDING · REDACTED

Administrative endpoint exposed without adequate access controls

IMPACT
Increases probability and impact of credential attacks.
FIX
Restrict admin access, enforce phishing-resistant MFA, add rate controls.
RETEST
Pending

The difference

Security does not stop at the plugin layer.

A secure WordPress configuration can still sit on an exposed server, weak account model, unsafe deployment process, or incomplete recovery plan. WP Server Guard examines how the complete system is configured, accessed, updated, monitored, and restored.

  1. 01

    External attack surface

    What is reachable from the public internet, and what it reveals.

  2. 02

    WordPress application and extensions

    Core, themes, plugins, and the configuration around them.

  3. 03

    Authentication and authorization

    Accounts, roles, administrative access, and session handling.

  4. 04

    Server, PHP, database, and file isolation

    The runtime beneath the site, and the boundaries between tenants.

  5. 05

    Detection, backups, recovery, and operational controls

    Whether a compromise would be noticed, and how quickly it is reversible.

Services

Seven defined engagements, each with a concrete deliverable.

Not sure which one you need?

Describe the system and the concern. Scoping determines whether the work is preventive, incident-related, or compliance-driven.

Request a Confidential Assessment

Engagement process

Controlled from scoping to retest.

  1. STEP 01

    Scope and authorize

    Define systems, objectives, exclusions, timing, contacts, and testing permission.

  2. STEP 02

    Assess and verify

    Combine tools with manual validation while respecting the agreed rules of engagement.

  3. STEP 03

    Report and explain

    Deliver prioritized findings, evidence, business impact, and practical remediation steps.

  4. STEP 04

    Remediate and retest

    Fix agreed issues directly or support the client's team, then verify the result.

The deliverable

Findings your team can act on.

Each finding carries severity, the affected component, sanitized evidence, business impact, a remediation summary, and a retest status. Scanner output is never reported as a confirmed vulnerability.

Review the redacted security report
FINDING WP-04 · SANITIZED EXTRACT 2 of 17
HIGH COMPONENT: WP-ADMIN / AUTH

Administrative endpoint exposed without adequate access controls

EVIDENCE

Sanitized request/response sequence included in the report.

BUSINESS IMPACT

Increases the probability and potential impact of credential attacks.

REMEDIATION

Restrict administrative access, enforce phishing-resistant MFA, and implement rate controls and alerting.

RETEST

Pending

Proof

Independent specialist. Verifiable history.

Additional verification, including certification checks and a legal contracting identity, is provided during scoping.

CASE STUDY · E-COMMERCE

Repeat reinfection stopped after entry point was closed

Three cleanups by others had not held. Persistence was removed, the likely initial-access path identified, and access rotated.

Read the WordPress reinfection case study →
CASE STUDY · MEMBERSHIP SITE

Server audit before an insurer questionnaire

Host, SSH, PHP isolation, and backup restoration were reviewed and documented, then retested after remediation.

Read the server security review case study →

Research & guides

Published work you can read before hiring anyone.

Real investigations and practical symptom guides, sanitized for public reading — free, with no email, form, or account required.

INCIDENT REPORT · 30+ SITES

ClickFix malware across a WordPress fleet

A coordinated infection mapped layer by layer: redacted evidence, IOC triage, MITRE ATT&CK mapping, and the cleanup that held. Free PDF included.

Read the ClickFix incident report →
GUIDES · HACKED-SITE SYMPTOMS

Start from the symptom you are seeing

Fake verification pages, spam redirects, Japanese search results, “Deceptive site ahead” warnings, unknown admin users, repeat reinfections — what each means and what actually fixes it.

Browse all security guides →
FREE DOWNLOAD · CHECKLIST

The WordPress security audit checklist

The control areas a real audit reviews — configuration, accounts, plugins, hosting, recovery — as a checklist you can run against your own site. HTML and PDF.

Get the audit checklist →

Client voice

Trusted with the same infrastructure for years.

“Guido has been handling our website security and server audits for over five years, and his work has been consistently reliable and thorough. He currently helps us keep more than eight servers secure, identifying vulnerabilities, hardening our websites, and addressing potential security issues before they can become serious problems. […] I would highly recommend him to anyone looking for an experienced and dependable website security specialist.”

Dan Wilson Verified client · August 2026
Read all client endorsements →

Confidentiality

Sensitive work requires controlled access.

Initial inquiries should contain no passwords, private keys, backup archives, or confidential source code. Access is arranged after scoping through temporary, least-privilege accounts and an agreed secure exchange method. Access should be removed when the engagement is complete.

NOTE

Never send credentials through this website. If a secret is submitted by accident, rotate it immediately without waiting for confirmation.

NDA available
Signed before scoping if you prefer.
Temporary access preferred
Named, least-privilege, with a documented expiry.
No credentials by email or form
An agreed secure exchange method is used instead.
Written authorization
Required before any active testing begins.
Defined testing windows
Agreed timing plus emergency contacts on both sides.
Secure deletion terms
Retention agreed per engagement, then evidence destroyed.
Is this an automated scan?

No. Tooling is used where it helps with coverage, but every reported issue is validated by hand before it appears in the report. Scanner output is never reported as a confirmed vulnerability.

Will testing affect production availability?

Production constraints and testing windows are agreed before any active testing. No destructive testing is performed unless it is separately and explicitly authorized, and a defined escalation contact is in place for the duration of the engagement.

What access will you need?

It depends on the engagement. Assessments often begin from the outside with no access at all; audits and hardening usually need a named, least-privilege account with a documented expiry. Access is arranged after scoping through an agreed secure exchange method — never through this website, email, or a form.

Can you fix the findings as well as report them?

Yes. Remediation can be carried out directly, or delivered as guidance for your own developers and system administrators. Agreed fixes are retested afterwards and the finding's retest status is updated in the report.

Start with a confidential assessment request.

Describe the system, concern, and desired outcome. Do not include credentials or sensitive files. You will receive a reply with the next scoping step.

Request an Assessment