“Ameetess is an international executive with broad experience in marketing and operations. She is tenacious, hard-working, intelligent, and loyal to the cause she is furthering. She is at the same time a commanding leader and an emotionally intelligent support when things get tough. I was impressed with her from the first interview onwards, and continue to be so. I warmly recommend her to executive roles in marketing or operations. ”
Sign in to view Ameetess’ full profile
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
Sign in to view Ameetess’ full profile
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
Los Angeles, California, United States
Sign in to view Ameetess’ full profile
Ameetess can introduce you to 2 people at Petzey
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
7K followers
500+ connections
Sign in to view Ameetess’ full profile
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
View mutual connections with Ameetess
Ameetess can introduce you to 2 people at Petzey
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
View mutual connections with Ameetess
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
Sign in to view Ameetess’ full profile
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
Experience & Education
-
Petzey
***
-
* ***********
****** *** ********* *******
-
****** ********* ***
******** *** ********* *******
View Ameetess’s full experience
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
Welcome back
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
New to LinkedIn? Join now
Licenses & Certifications
Recommendations received
6 people have recommended Ameetess
Join now to viewView Ameetess’ full profile
-
See who you know in common
-
Get introduced
-
Contact Ameetess directly
Other similar profiles
-
Steve Patterson
Steve Patterson
Orangetheory Fitness & Restore Hyper Wellness
4K followersNewport Beach, CA
Explore more posts
-
Dharti Desai Chatterjee
Toronto Business Development… • 10K followers
GTM has become corporate cosplay. Most teams slap "𝐆𝐨-𝐓𝐨-𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐞𝐭 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐠𝐲" on what's actually just a lead gen plan with better branding. Here's the tell: if your "GTM strategy" lives in a marketing deck and gets presented after the product roadmap is locked, it's not GTM. It's damage control with a strategic label. Real GTM isn't a campaign. It's a business decision. It answers questions most teams skip entirely: ◼️ Why does this deserve to exist in our portfolio? ◼️ What are we willing to not do to make this work? ◼️ Which buyer actually has budget authority - and do they know they have this problem? ◼️ Does our pricing model match how customers perceive value, or how finance wants to report revenue? ◼️ Can support actually handle the customer profile that's going to buy this? GTM coordinates product, sales, marketing, finance, ops, and support before launch - not after the deck goes to the board. What usually happens instead: Product ships. Marketing runs ads. Sales gets deck training. Everyone calls it GTM.Then launch day hits and: → The market doesn't understand the category → Sales can't explain why this isn't a feature → Pricing feels arbitrary → Support wasn't briefed on the actual buyer That's beyond a marketing problem. It's a coordination failure with good slides. Here's the deeper issue: Most GTM plans are still built with an old-school CMO mindset - brand first, quarterly cycles, impressions as the success metric. Modern GTM works differently: → Revenue systems, not awareness campaigns → Weekly iteration, not quarterly planning → Pipeline math (CAC, LTV, conversion rates) driving every decision → Every dollar of spend tracked to closed revenue The real test? If you can't explain your GTM strategy without saying "campaigns," "MQLs," or "funnel" - you don't have one. So: does your org actually do GTM, or is it just demand gen in a nicer suit? #GoToMarket #GTMStrategy #RevenueStrategy #RevenueSystems #B2BGrowth #GrowthLeadership #PipelineStrategy #MarketEntry #PricingStrategy #ProductMarketFit #ExecutiveLeadership #BusinessStrategy
37
13 Comments -
Van Diamandakis
Evvia Consulting • 9K followers
The board deck was green in March. Traffic on plan. MQLs on target. Two quarters later, the pipeline came in soft, and the room turned to, who else, the CMO. That sequence is playing out across B2B right now, and most are misreading it. The instinct is to blame the execution. The campaigns, the SDRs, sellers, and the marketing leader. One of them usually takes the weight of the hit. The wrong person pays for a problem they didn’t create. What’s changed is that the buyers left your website. Bain has zero-click as the default, with B2B traffic down 15-25% and software click-through rates down as much as 30%. Forrester finds buyers who research with AI are one-tenth as likely to click through at all. They didn’t stop researching. They research more than ever. They just stopped doing it where you can see them. Gartner now estimates that 70% of the B2B buying journey occurs in the dark funnel. Which means your demand model is forecasting from a leading indicator that accounts for less than a third of how buyers decide. The dashboard reports green on a layer that stopped mattering. And your pipeline confirms the truth two quarters too late. John Buten at Forrester calls it a visibility vacuum. That’s spot on, and it’s the story behind the traffic headlines. I wrote the new model for Field Friday this week. The argument: Your demand model assumes the funnel starts on your website. It doesn’t anymore. The piece walks through the four questions a board-grade dashboard answers, the one yours has gone blind to, what moves it, the math that turns the answer into a forecast a CRO can take to the board, and seven questions for Monday’s staff meeting. Link in the first comment. ⬇️ #B2BMarketing #CMO #CRO #GTMStrategy #DemandGen #MarketingAI
15
2 Comments -
Ben Putley
Alkimi Exchange • 8K followers
The exit of two of the world’s biggest agencies from Openpath isn’t just a story about one marketplace. It highlights a deeper truth: transparency can’t be bolted on as a feature. When fee flows and inventory paths are opaque by design, no amount of “directness” messaging will rebuild trust. The industry is at a crossroads: either we accept that auditability requires architecture (immutable records, governance that removes conflicts of interest, and verifiable economics) or we keep repackaging the same dynamics with better branding. AI only accelerates the urgency. As automated decisioning takes more control over spend, buyers need to know the system itself is trustworthy, not just the sales deck. The open web doesn’t just need better players. It needs better infrastructure. Read my full comment in Performance Marketing World: https://lnkd.in/eYdpGKw9
14
-
Samantha Rose
Endless Commerce • 7K followers
I've watched founders tear apart a landing page that was converting just fine. Sessions had spiked and orders held steady, but the conversion rate cratered. If that's you, take a look into who's browsing before you bust out the 🔨 . Great breakdown from Allegra Poschmann and the Pact team.
2
1 Comment -
Nataly Kelly
Zappi • 29K followers
Behind every great marketing team is a great agency partner (or several). As the CMO of Zappi, I hire agencies with the same care I hire an FTE for my team. Here's the reality most CMOs face: Your headcount is always going to be lean. Your budget is finite. Your internal team can't be experts at everything. And you need to move fast. This is where agencies become critical. They give you: ▶ Flexibility you can't get with full-time hires ▶ Scale up for a launch, scale down after ▶ No long hiring cycles when you need to move quickly ▶ Specialized expertise your team doesn't have ▶ Deep knowledge in specific channels ▶ Cross-industry perspective from working with multiple clients ▶ Access to tools and tech you don't need to own ▶ Speed that changes everything ▶ Faster implementation than building in-house ▶ Teams ready to execute immediately ▶ No learning curve on new platforms or tactics The best agency relationships aren't transactional. They're partnerships. The agencies that understand your business. Know your customers. Challenge your thinking. Bring ideas, not just execution. At Zappi, our agency partners are essential. They enable us to punch above our weight. To compete with companies 10x our size. To launch campaigns that would take months to build internally. The mistake CMOs make? Treating agencies like order-takers instead of strategic partners. (By the way... same mistake when insights teams are treated this way, too!) The best CMOs I know: → Share business context deeply → Include agencies in planning early → Give them room to bring ideas → Build long-term relationships, not project-based transactions Your marketing results depend on your team AND your partners. Choose agencies that align with your values. That feel like an extension of your own team. Who embrace similar ways of thinking. And that stand to help you learn and make you even better. Shout out to Avery Akkineni and our partners at VaynerX VaynerMedia (pictured with the wonderful and hilarious Rob Mayhew). 💚 Follow me (Nataly Kelly) for more CMO advice. #CMO #marketing #agencies
23
4 Comments -
Jason Kutasi
YPO • 5K followers
Advertisers, Marketers & Employees are gonna hate hearing this… but it’s why we stay profitable. We typically 99% of the time pay no commission for the first six months. Here’s why: For the first 90 days, I’m training you. And I’m probably losing money on you. (This is on the affiliate side, not the agency side.) The next 90 days? I’m just making my money back. At the end of six months, we’re even. Only after that do we start talking commission. A lot of people hate this when they’re new. But it’s the reality of bringing someone up to speed: - You’re expensive to train. - You’re not producing real profit yet. - And if you quit in 3 months… dude I just paid to educate you for someone else. Once you’re contributing real ROI, I’ll gladly share upside. But until then your job is to focus on learning the craft and proving you can actually win. Too many companies bleed cash paying commission on top of training losses. It feels generous but it’s just bad math and worse business.
5
-
Daniel Weiner
YouShouldTalkTo • 17K followers
Whether an agency search is consultant led or handled by the brand, I think we all, myself included, take for granted the amount of orchestration it takes to arrive at a fruitful pitch. Not like, the logistics. Although calendar jenga, travel schedules, and making sure people show up on time, where they are supposed to, often in random cities/locations, is a feat in and of itself. I'm talking about the orchestration around the dissemination of information from brand to agencies, so that those agencies... a) know what they are doing + the challenge at hand b) feel confident in what they are doing (and that they are a great fit) c) arrive at a pitch where they finish and the brand says 'holy sh*t, that was great!'. I'm talking about the orchestration around the dissemination of information from agencies to brand, so that the brand... a) knows exactly what the agency does well and how they would work towards solving the challenge at hand. b) feels reallllllllllly confident in their final decision c) watches a few pitches and thinks 'wow, holy sh*t, we could work with all these groups!" Taking a brief or an RFP and running with it may seem easy. For some, it is. I've become numb to it. If you're in marketing, you probably have too. A friendly reminder that is sure as sh*t is NOT easy. Pitches are HARD. WORK. oh yea...and if you win...you get the distinct honor of getting thrown directly into the fire...usually immediately :)
15
1 Comment -
Anton Chernyshov
Nexfit.com • 209 followers
Gamma + n8n + GPT-5 is kind of wild... It basically turned into an AI presentation engine that pulled in $47K in deck services last month. 🤯 While agencies charge $3K–$5K per deck and take two weeks… this thing spits out investor-grade presentations in *11 minutes.* No designers. No PowerPoint prison. No revision hell. 🙏 Here’s the workflow in plain words: → Client fills a form with 5 things: topic, audience, goal, brand colors, deadline → n8n fires off a GPT-5 run that builds the entire narrative architecture → Gamma renders a polished, investor-ready deck instantly → System auto-exports to Drive, drafts the client email, logs everything in Sheets → Every output is tracked so delivery is literally instant And the whole stack runs 24/7 while you sleep. 😴⚙️ Why it feels unfair: → You generate 50 variations while competitors build 1 manually → Each deck costs pennies, you charge $500–$2K → No designers slowing anything down → Quality looks Fortune-500 level → Delivery happens automatically through pre-written emails One consultant used this to productize their entire firm. They jumped from 4 custom decks a month to 40+. Same workload… just scaled by automation. 📈 The real shift is psychological: You’re not selling “presentations.” You’re selling *presentation infrastructure* that compounds.
1
Explore top content on LinkedIn
Find curated posts and insights for relevant topics all in one place.
View top content