$1 Trillion at the Whitehouse: Will Telcos Dare to Sell Into It? At the White House, tech leaders pledged more than $1 trillion in new U.S. investments. Everyone else is debating politics. I’m looking at Telco opportunities. That trillion is not just money Big Tech will spend on themselves. It’s money they’ll spend on infrastructure, connectivity, and trust. And that’s where telcos can win. Here are 10 things telcos can sell back to Big Tech: 1. Data centers & edge hosting 2. Edge GPU hubs 3. Programmable network slices 4. Identity & trust fabric 5. Subsea & satellite capacity 6. Enterprise AI networks 7. Energy-linked private networks 8. LLM caching at the edge 9. Security as a service 10. Data for Physical AI Telcos don’t always need to be the buyers. We can also be the sellers. We don’t lack capability. We lack will to move beyond GB/Month. The trillion is on the table. Question is: who takes the lion’s share?
Interesting how nobody on here is concerned with the god-tier level of brown nosing going on in this meeting? I find it interesting how happy big tech executives are to kiss Trump’s ring in public. In other cultures, this kind of revolting toadying is discouraged.
Brilliant breakdown. Too often, telcos see themselves as “pipe providers” when, in reality, this trillion-dollar wave is begging for platform thinking. What stands out here is that every opportunity on the list is not just infrastructure; it’s a value multiplier for Big Tech. Whoever frames these capabilities not as bandwidth but as strategic enablers (trust, performance, security, intelligence) will capture the premium. The mindset shift telcos need: stop competing on GB/month, start competing on mission-critical outcomes. Curious to see which operator will be bold enough to flip the script and sell back into Big Tech first.
Sebastian Barros, this is spot on. On the submarine cables, we have seen a shift. A few years back these were built by telco’s consortia. Now it is dominated by hyperscalers, as prime, and they lease back unused capacity/fibers. Quite the opposite. Unless there are applications that would trully need proximity to the end user (people or machines), I question if telcos can exploit the value of edge compute. Do you see it differently?
What about the "hot mic"? 😆 The numbers sounded good but the brownnosing made it cringe. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cw8UE5Z9zP4
Sebastian Barros Thank you for sharing this video..."This" is not like an episode from Aprentice TV show...where at the end Donald Trump, as of the respective date, The President of USA, can say it loud.."you are fired"...right?!?! ..there is an indication of a date being 04.09.2025, but the content of the "conversation" is interesting because usually "those kind of estimates" are done within the context of S.W.O.T. Analysis....partly looking at the Market trends, but also very much about the "Competition"....or those are just details not applied to this type of "reality show"...or there is more, much more about those Enterprises Product, Solution, Market and Competition assessment, that is not shown in the Video ...Thank you for sharing it...
I do wonder if share buy backs can be classed as an investment...
🌬️🍊👑💨🦋🌀 ✅🏃♀️🏃♂️💨🇺🇸 ⚡🏃♂️💨🛢️ 🔮🙄👀 🧭🚀 ✌️ 👇
Nokia•8K followers
6moThis trillion is not “easy money” for telcos, but it is a once-in-a-generation opportunity. Tech companies will need infrastructure, connectivity, and trust layers that telcos are uniquely positioned to provide. The money is real, but it won’t simply flow to telcos unless they act decisively, partner smartly, and show they can be builders, not just carriers. Otherwise, the lion’s share will vanish into others’ hands. This is the moment for telcos to truly partner with Big Tech and share in the revenues, not just provide the pipes.