Property talk:P141

One of novalue, Least Concern (Q211005), Near Threatened (Q719675), Vulnerable (Q278113), Endangered status (Q96377276), Critically Endangered (Q219127), extinct in the wild (Q239509), extinct species (Q237350), Data Deficient (Q3245245), not evaluated (Q3350324): value must be one of the specified items. Please expand list if needed. (Help)

List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P141#One of, values statistics, hourly updated report, search, SPARQL

Single best value: this property generally contains a single value. If there are several, one would have preferred rank (Help)

List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P141#single best value, hourly updated report, SPARQL

Item “taxon name (P225)”: Items with this property should also have “taxon name (P225)”. (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). Known exceptions: Varia jamoerensis (Q27988539)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P141#Item P225, search, SPARQL

Item “taxon rank (P105): species (Q7432), variety (Q767728), subspecies (Q68947)”: Items with this property should also have “taxon rank (P105): species (Q7432), variety (Q767728), subspecies (Q68947)”. (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). Known exceptions: Varia jamoerensis (Q27988539)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P141#Item P105, search

Item “IUCN taxon ID (P627)”: Items with this property should also have “IUCN taxon ID (P627)”. (Help)

List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P141#Item P627, hourly updated report, search, SPARQL

Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P141#Entity types

Scope is as main value (Q54828448): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P141#Scope, SPARQL

Type “taxon (Q16521)”: item must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “taxon (Q16521)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P141#Type Q16521, SPARQL

Value IUCN category Ia: Strict Nature Reserve (Q14545608) will be automatically replaced to value IUCN category Ia: Strict Nature Reserve (Q14545608) and moved to IUCN protected areas category (P814) property. Testing: TODO list

Value IUCN category Ib: Wilderness Area (Q14545620) will be automatically replaced to value IUCN category Ib: Wilderness Area (Q14545620) and moved to IUCN protected areas category (P814) property. Testing: TODO list

Value IUCN category II: National Park (Q14545628) will be automatically replaced to value IUCN category II: National Park (Q14545628) and moved to IUCN protected areas category (P814) property. Testing: TODO list

Value IUCN category III: Natural Monument or Feature (Q14545633) will be automatically replaced to value IUCN category III: Natural Monument or Feature (Q14545633) and moved to IUCN protected areas category (P814) property. Testing: TODO list

Value IUCN category IV: Habitat/Species Management Area (Q14545639) will be automatically replaced to value IUCN category IV: Habitat/Species Management Area (Q14545639) and moved to IUCN protected areas category (P814) property. Testing: TODO list

Value IUCN category V: Protected Landscape/Seascape (Q14545646) will be automatically replaced to value IUCN category V: Protected Landscape/Seascape (Q14545646) and moved to IUCN protected areas category (P814) property. Testing: TODO list

Value IUCN category VI: Protected Area with sustainable use of natural resources (Q14545652) will be automatically replaced to value IUCN category VI: Protected Area with sustainable use of natural resources (Q14545652) and moved to IUCN protected areas category (P814) property. Testing: TODO list

Value endangered species (Q11394) will be automatically replaced to value Endangered status (Q96377276). Testing: TODO list

This property is being used by: cs:Šablona:Taxobox, cs:Šablona:Taxobox/compare, cs:Šablona:Test, cs:Šablona:Taxobox/statusWD bg:Шаблон:Taxobox hu:Sablon:Taxobox, hu:Sablon:Taxobox/teszt hy:Կաղապար:Տաքսոտուփ ia:Patrono:Infobox/typo/taxon, ia:Patrono:Infobox/articulo/subclasse de biota, ia:Patrono:Infobox/articulo/biota nn:Mal:Infoboks biologi no:Mal:Taksoboks, no:Mal:Wikidata Infobox/core uk:Шаблон:Taxobox datacheck eu:Txantiloi:Taxotaula automatikoa, eu:Txantiloi:Taxotaula/probak ca:Plantilla:Infotaula taxonòmica ka:თარგი:ტაქსოდაფა commons:Template:Wikidata Infobox/core cy:Nodyn:Wikidata Infobox es:Plantilla:Wikidata Infobox id:Templat:Wikidata infobox, id:Templat:Kotak info Wikidata/inti, id:Templat:Kotak info taksonomi otomatis, id:Templat:Kotak info taksonomi spesies, id:Templat:Automatic taxobox, id:Templat:Speciesbox mw:Template:Wikidata Infobox/core mr:साचा:विकिडाटा माहितीचौकट/core, mr:साचा:विकिडेटा माहितीचौकट/core sa:फलकम्:Wikidata Infobox ur:سانچہ:خانہ معلومات ویکی ڈیٹا/کور, ur:سانچہ:تصنيف كائن/حالة حفظ من ويكي بيانات, ur:سانچہ:Wikidata Infobox/core ha:Template:Automatic taxobox, ha:Samfuri:Automatic taxobox q:fr:Modèle:Wikidata Infobox/core mt:Mudell:Automatic taxobox diq:Şablon:Tewri de:Vorlage:Wikidata Infobox/core gu:ઢાંચો:Wikidata Infobox/core ta:வார்ப்புரு:Wikidata Infobox/core, ta:வார்ப்புரு:Speciesbox/wikidata hi:साँचा:Wikidata Infobox/core hyw:Կաղապար:Taxobox ar:قالب:صندوق معلومات كائن/حالة حفظ من ويكي بيانات kab:Talɣa:Autoarticle taxon, kab:Talɣa:Automatic taxobox, kab:Talɣa:Autoarticle taxon/source sv:Mall:Wikidata Infobox/core s:zh:Template:Wikidata Infobox/core ckb:داڕێژە:Wikidata Infobox/core pt:Predefinição:Wikidata Infobox/core vec:Modèl:Tassobox arz:قالب:تصنيف كائن/حالة حفظ من ويكي بيانات incubator:Template:Wp/shi/Datastub taxon, incubator:Template:Wp/zgh/Automatic taxobox ku:Şablon:Wikidata Infobox/core mnw:ထာမ်ပလိက်:Wikidata Infobox/core species:Template:Image-IUCN shi:Talɣa:Datastub taxon b:eu:Txantiloi:Taxotaula automatikoa d:Template:Wikidata Infobox/core dag:Tɛmplet:Taxon s:ban:Mal:Wikidata Infobox/core ban:Mal:Wikidata Infobox/core lv:Veidne:Wikidata Infobox/core ab:Ашаблон:Taxobox/ВД астатус ary:موضيل:معلومات كائن ast:Plantía:Taxotabla automática mzn:شابلون:صندخ/موجود/بقای وضعیت ویکی دیتا جه voy:shn:ထႅမ်းပလဵတ်ႉ:Wikidata Infobox s:hi:साँचा:Wikidata Infobox/core glk:قالب:زيبيل/جاندار/بقا وضعيت ويکي‌دیتا جه zgh:ⴰⵍⴱⵓⴹ:Automatic taxobox oc:Modèl:Infobox Taxon ps:کينډۍ:Wikidata Infobox/core cbk-zam:Plantilla:Wikidata Infobox/core mad:Cèṭa'an:Speciesbox gl:Modelo:Taxon, gl:Modelo:Taxon/probas s:ta:வார்ப்புரு:Wikidata Infobox/core gor:Templat:Speciesbox Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

I propose to move from Extinction (which is general article) to Extinct (which is exactly IUCN conservation status). . I also suggest that it will require some changes in User:Ricordisamoa/Wikispecies.js and Special:AbuseFilter/15. Infovarius (talk) 09:44, 14 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

 Done the changes. --Ricordisamoa 19:25, 14 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Update: now SamoaBot can handle these situations: it can change the claim value, and also add a reference. Here is the current approval discussion. --Ricordisamoa 22:45, 19 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

A few remaining old ones are listed at Constraint_violations. --  Docu  at 20:55, 2 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Actually, it occurs to me that Legobot and SamoaBot already changed all values. You can check here. --Ricordisamoa 23:10, 2 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

There's a little edit war at Q15083. Can anyone else (except Succu) discuss if we should/can/prohibit to store historical information about conservation status in Wikidata? I suppose that (usually, as for other properties) we can. Infovarius (talk) 12:15, 19 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

I support storing the historic values. ChristianKl (talk) 11:29, 27 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

What do you understand by „historic value”? In the case in question the cirumscription of the species radically changed. How would you annotate this? --Succu (talk) 13:11, 27 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Circumscription may be, but for a new species we create a new item. So one item contain information (historical too) for one taxon. --Infovarius (talk) 18:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Another random statement, Infovarius? --Succu (talk) 21:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

For state (Q7275). For example, Germany (Q183): member of (P463) - Economic, Monetary and Social Union (Q2595976) 1.07.1990 - 2.10.1990; European Atomic Energy Community (Q8919) - 1957-2009; Western European Union (Q189946) - 1954-2011; European Coal and Steel Community (Q161549) - 1951-2002. currency (P38) - Deutsche Mark (Q16068) 1948-2001; flag image (P41) - 1919, 1933, 1935; shares border with (P47) Czechoslovakia (Q33946) 1918-1992, German Democratic Republic (Q16957). head of state (P35) - Theodor Heuss (Q2594) - 1949-1959 and so on.

For university (Q3918). For example, Leipzig University (Q154804): official name (P1448) - 1991-1953, rector (P1075) Johannes Otto von Münsterberg (Q1698117) - 1409-1410 and so on

For automobile manufacturer (Q786820). For example, Mercedes-Benz Group (Q27530): follows (P155) Daimler-Benz AG (Q541477), Maybach (Q35989); employees (P1128) 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015; child organization or unit (P355) Stellantis North America (Q181114) 1998-2007 ... and so on.

For species (Q7432). For example, giraffe (Q15083): IUCN conservation status (P141) - 12.2016. And only? Why? Where 09.2016? species (Q7432) has less right to display the full information? --Fractaler (talk) 10:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

When a species has no record in the IUCN database (e.g. Lirimiris auriflua (Q13480988) and is classed as "Not evaluated" according to GBIF, the statement should not generate a warning that the IUCN is missing. @Daniel_Mietchen: FYI --DarTar (talk) 19:55, 2 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Around two million species are not evaluated by the IUCN. We do not mark them with not evaluated (Q3350324). --Succu (talk) 20:19, 2 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

But how would you present historical values then? I wanted to add that European hamster (Q208077) was not evaluated before July 2020, when it was immediately added to the list as "critically endangered". Now there're two validation errors, which are both wrong in my opinion. --Tkarcher (talk) 09:27, 13 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

could someone explain why the IUCN Red List Categorie "endangered species" (Q11394) was amended to "Endangered status" (Q96377276) at (P141)?

Maybe there are issues at Q96377276, because the status Endangered (IUCN) was already available at Q11394! Or the different assigned language articels and labels for Q96377276 are mixed up with different meanings, and therefore Q96377276 is not trustworthy until fixed.

If so, the implemted Autofix, as mentioned in above documentation matrix has to fixed.

Currently the Autofix causes the error that the IUCN label/photo for all species, which have been enterred with IUCN Red List Categorie "Endangerd" in wikidata, do not show the IUCN label/photo (just a broken picture simple is visible).

P.S.: Before the start of this discussion, I have fixed the parameters for "IUCN conservation status" (P141) and now the IUCN label/photo appears correctly again for every species assigned to the IUCN Red List Categorie "Endangered" at the wikidata.

It would be great if this error could be corrected. Thanks Lodewicus de Honsvels (talk) 19:12, 28 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

The conservation status of many species is old and out of date, and this information is propagated across the web. For example, the Streambank froglet (Crinia riparia) was assessed by IUCN in 2020 as Endangered. On Wikipedia, its conservation status is still listed as "Least Concern" and this is repeated at iNaturalist, Google, and presumably many other sites that rely on Wikipedia.

It seems the solution would be to keep Wikidata's property P141 in sync with the latest IUCN assessments, which are updated periodically.

One solution would be for volunteers to systematically update this property. However, with 48,600 threatened species, this would be an enormous task. An automated method may be possible using the IUCN Red List API.

Are people aware of this issue? Has there been any proposal along these lines?

Mheberger (talk) 18:56, 18 February 2026 (UTC)Reply