> On 9. Oct 2025, at 20:54, Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com> wrote:
>
> One outstanding question is whether to allow reordering of parameters in the PFA closure by
> using named arguments. With this implementation, Arnaud says it's possible to do if we decide
> to. I am still concerned that it would create too much complexity and confusion in practice. But
> we're willing to go with a broad consensus if it emerges.
Hi
I also find it confusing if I define a different parameter order in the partial function and then
this order is automatically overridden to the original order rather than being used. When I
consciously change the parameter order, I expect this order to be preserved in the resulting
function. That's the behavior I would expect as a developer.
Cheers
Joshua Rüsweg