> On Nov 1, 2025, at 12:56, Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2025, at 4:22 AM, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 2025-10-30 19:44, schrieb Larry Garfield:
>>> The one outstanding question is whether we allow reordering using named
>>> arguments or preserve the underlying order. Arnaud says either one is
>>> doable. So far, only 2 people have commented on it (favoring
>>> reordering). We still want feedback from more people to see if there
>>> really is a consensus one way or another. (2 people is too small a
>>> sample size to draw any conclusions.)
>>
>> It appears there is a larger (and unanimous) agreement. This should be
>> adjusted in the RFC then. Other than that, I've read through the RFC
>> once more and have the following comments:
>
> Mm, yeah, it would appear I have been outvoted. :-) So be it. The RFC has been updated to
> include reordering, and Arnaud will update the implementation shortly.
Just another data point—I prefer reordering, too. It seems like the more intuitive experience.
Cheers,
Ben