Hi Steve,
From my experiences, FastCGI performance is comparable to mod_php.
Andi
At 02:24 PM 8/9/2005 -0700, steve roussey wrote:
On 8/9/05, Andreas Korthaus <akorthaus@web.de> wrote:
By using lighttpd with fastcgi we seperate the webserver process from
php processes (which could even work on other machines)...
Someone else emailed me about using FastCGI with Apache 2.1/event but
I just figured that there would be a significant slowdown using
FastCGI rather than a module/handler. (Currently I compile PHP into
Apache statically and turn off Apache's dynamic module loading ability
-- something I couldn't figure out in Apache2). What is your
experience with FastCGI?
For simple dynamic requests we can use mod_cml
Sadly, this won't work with any system I manage since we do a lot of
stat reporting, even on a per user basis. And we need to have PHP
loaded to know the user, etc...
Still, I looked at lighttpd and it looks promising. The one thing that
started all of this was Apache 2.1's event MPM that used a single
thread to handle all open Keep-Alives looked very efficient.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit:
http://www.php.net/unsub.php