At 16:36 15/08/2005, George Schlossnagle wrote:
On Aug 15, 2005, at 5:05 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
That's an excellent response. If one percent of the energy put
into the 'yay parade' and the 'let's break this too!' parade were
invested in coming up with a clean upgrade path, I wouldn't have
had to write the response I wrote.
Would it be productive to compile a list of wants, then to agree that
allowing BC/ensuring a good migration path will be a criteria by
which these wants will be vetted?
I agree that ensuring a migration
path is critical. Wez and I were discussing this in the car this
morning, and short of magic_quoutes_runtime, they all seemed like
they were straightforward to handle through am include (except for
the parameter order thing, but that's an awful awful idea).
Where does using case sensitive identifiers fall?
Zeev