Re: Allowing [SAPI=] entries in ini files.
On 16.11.13, 15:54, Richard Quadling wrote:
> The patch allows [SAPI=xxx] sections and they operate in a very similar way
> to the [HOST] and [PATH] sections.
That would be a good addition, but I wonder what would be the priority
of sections?
Because that's something which needs to be carefully documented
or is it just "latest wins"?
--
Alexey Zakhlestin
CTO at Grids.by/you
https://github.com/indeyets
PGP key: http://indeyets.ru/alexey.zakhlestin.pgp.asc
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc
Thread (16 messages)