Re: Allowing [SAPI=] entries in ini files.
On 20 November 2013 09:51, Alexey Zakhlestin <indeyets@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 16.11.13, 15:54, Richard Quadling wrote:
> > The patch allows [SAPI=xxx] sections and they operate in a very similar
> way
> > to the [HOST] and [PATH] sections.
>
> That would be a good addition, but I wonder what would be the priority
> of sections?
>
> Because that's something which needs to be carefully documented
>
> or is it just "latest wins"?
>
>
SAPI is applied first, then the current order of HOST and then PATH. HOST
and PATH only apply to specific SAPIs it seems (CGI and FPM).
SAPI would apply to all SAPIs.
Richard.
--
Richard Quadling
Twitter : @RQuadling
Thread (16 messages)