Re: func_get_args BC break
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I agree that the change makes BC break for some tricky code :(
> and i don't insist to keep it in 5.5.
>
> Thanks. Dmitry.
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Can we do anything to fix it? Is the problem limited only to
> > pass-object-by-ref or also for other by-ref scenarios? In the latter
> > case it does constitute a BC break I think and it may be a good idea to
> > move it to 5.6...
> >
> >
>
Hi,
as we agreed that this is a BC break, I don't think that it is a good idea
even for 5.6.
could we also create a test for this behavior, so we don't change this
unintentionally later on?
--
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
Thread (5 messages)