Am 31.01.2014 13:55, schrieb Johannes Schlüter:
> On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 13:41 +0100, Ulf Wendel wrote:
>> Am 31.01.2014 13:36, schrieb Johannes Schlüter:
>>> I think adding this patch to 5.x therefore would be quite some bending
>>> of that rule and that combined with the fact that it is late makes me
>>> believe that proposing this for 5.6 is illegal.
>>
>> Are you saying the RFC is 'illegal' ? If the subject proposed is not
>> allowed, it would make litte sense collecting votes.
>
> I think the RM has to reject this from 5.6 independently from the voting
> result as he is bound by the release process RFC.
Thanks for explaining. The three takeaway point for me are:
- you are serious about following the rules
- a radical minded person may refuse to vote in the first place
Ulf