> There are so many bugs which are actually considered features by so
> many people of this list. But actually, I'd really love you guys
> specify the tons of examples of really weird behaviour found here:
> http://www.phpwtf.org/
> That should be a good read for everyone who thinks that PHP is just
> fine and does not need a fundamental redesign.
You seem to contradict yourself here. Do you want those
implementations reverse-engineered into a specification ("spec to
build," as was done with ECMAScript) or do you want a "fundamental
redesign" (implying those examples should behave differently)?
Also, if you submit a list of legit surprises, it shouldn't have
Newbie Nodocs examples cluttering it up. FALSE fails an array
typehint? A string constant can't be checked with instanceof, but a
$variable variant can be? NULL isn't considered scalar? Sorry, these
just don't carry any shock value. Yohgaki's inconsistencies RFC has
much better zingers if that's what you want.
-- Sandy