Re: PHP Specification

From: Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 17:21:21 +0000
Subject: Re: PHP Specification
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-73455@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
"Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa" <ivan.enderlin@hoa-project.net> schrieb:
>
> On 26/03/2014 18:58, David Soria Parra wrote:
>> "Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa" <ivan.enderlin@hoa-project.net> schrieb:
>>> On 24/03/2014 10:37, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 10:15 +0100, Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa wrote:
>>>>>      * the historical interpreter [1],
>>>> How is that historic? It is the prime standard with most active
>>>> contributors etc.
>>> Historical is not synonym of out-dated. Historical means it is the first
>>> interpreter, that's all.
>> We should just call it cphp or something to distinguish language (PHP) from the
>> php.net reference implementation :)
> What about php-src?
I am not sure about php-src as it refers to the source itself, but it's fine
by me as long as we have a distinguished name.


Thread (53 messages)

« previous php.internals (#73455) next »