Thank you for removing it from the front page, Zeev. It needed to be done.
Based on the discussion here, I've compiled an informal count of who
advocates which action:
Remove the post: 13 (81.25%)
....and don't replace it: 1 (6.25%; 7.69%)
....and replace (or modify) it: 10 (62.5%; 76.92%)
....and ???: 2 (12.5%; 15.38%)
Keep the post: 3 (18.75%)
It looks like there's a pretty clear consensus that the post should be
removed (which it was). There's also a clear consensus that it should be
replaced with something since it's already been widely disseminated.
I think it should cover the points Pierre proposed: A brief explanation of
phpng and a note explaining why the original post was removed. I would
like to add that a link to an archive of the original post that was removed
should be included in that note for the sake of transparency.
--Kris
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote:
> > I am about 99% confident you have karma; why haven't you done it?
>
> After 2815 days from the previous commit, I've finally committed something
> new to phpweb...
>
> I unlinked the news entry from the homepage but for now kept it on the 2014
> archive so that whomever kept links they'd still work.
>
> Zeev
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>