Trimming all the forwarding around ...
On 29/05/14 09:29, Pierre Joye wrote:
Long story short, we are at a critical point in the php history. Yet
again we are about to begin the next major PHP version. If we do not
have to fail, and that could be our last chance, we have to put our
ego, emotions, personal goals on the side and begin to work more, much
more, together. We have to communicate (and internals is the only
place where you reach anyone), more, better, more respectfully and
early, as early as possible for every possible idea. Communication is
not about politics, communication about getting more people involved,
early and try to get everyone on the same board and in sync.
That phpng throws an area of the creation of phpnext open for discussion, and offers limited demonstrations of the capabilities of that solution is a fact. It is currently actually a block to progress until such time as others can become involved, and incorporating other developments into it seems to be on hold? It is only concentrating on a sub-set of what is needed for phpnext and so the discussion that is still needed is just what else should be addressed.
Unicode support is probably still in the melting pot, as much as the string length of internal string elements and opinions are still divided as to if those internal strings SHOULD support unicode?
Re-factoring function names and perhaps making strings proper objects are all important elements, and this re-factoring may well impinge on the 'results' that phpng is reporting anyway?
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk