On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Michael Wallner <mike.php.net@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 27 07 2014, at 02:53, Kris Craig <kris.craig@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> So even IF you want to reduce the scope of the 2/3 requirement to language
>> impacts in userland only, your RFC *still* falls under that requirement
>> because it directly affects the language itself in userland, as described
>> above. I would again invite you to reconsider your position on this and
>> avoid a protracted fight on this that would only serve to split the
>> community.
>
>
> I’m actually not sure why we even have to vote on PHP-NG?
As it is surely a rhetoric question, let leave it, ok?
> How about for the crusaders to build something comparable to put up to vote against PHP-NG?
>
> There isn’t? Well, then let’s go ahead. Simple.
>
> Rolling eyes,
> Mike
>
>
> PS: My dog wants voting rights because he feels like he’ll be affected by changes to PHP.
This kind of post surely brings us a huge step forward.
Cheers,
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org