0
$\begingroup$

I recently filmed the track-installation process for a Liebherr PR 776 crawler bulldozer at the Liebherr factory in Telfs (Austria). During assembly, the tracks are not pre-mounted to the undercarriage before attaching the upper structure. Instead, the tracks are installed as a separate stage, where a full rolled track chain is unwound under tension and wrapped around the final drives and rollers.

Here is a short video showing the exact process: 👉 https://youtu.be/7aNdsUDCfmU

On the other hand, many excavators are assembled differently:

  • The tracks are installed directly onto the lower frame at the beginning

  • Then the complete upper structure (“the house”) is lifted and bolted to the undercarriage — the so-called “wedding”

My question: What engineering or manufacturing reasons explain why bulldozers, especially heavy units like the PR 776, use this separate track-installation method instead of the excavator-style pre-mounted approach?

Possible factors I’m wondering about:

  • Weight distribution or frame geometry

  • Tensioning requirements of bulldozer tracks

  • Differences in undercarriage design (e.g., sprocket position, roller layout)

  • Ergonomics and safety of lifting the full assembly

  • Production-line constraints

  • Component access for hydraulics or final drive assembly

I’d really appreciate a detailed engineering explanation. Thanks in advance!

New contributor
PlaceSun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.
$\endgroup$

0

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.