4

We read of a conspiracy in Mtt 28:12-15( NIV):

When the chief priests had met with the elders and devised a plan, they gave the soldiers a large sum of money, telling them, “You are to say, ‘His disciples came during the night and stole him away while we were asleep.’ If this report gets to the governor, we will satisfy him and keep you out of trouble.” So the soldiers took the money and did as they were instructed. And this story has been widely circulated among the Jews to this very day.

We see the Apostles, right from the Pentecost, preaching the Risen Christ( Acts 2:22-24). We however, do not see them openly countering the soldiers' lie . How did they prevail over the ' widely circulated' lie sponsored by the Chief Priests ? Does Acts or any extra -biblical writings give a narrative of or clue to their strategy ?

Improve this question
4
  • 6
    I don't understand the question. Matthew, the first of the evangelists to write an account, specifically reports the lie that had been told. Yet you say 'we do not see [the apostles] openly countering the soldier's lie'. What do you think Matthew is doing, the very first time (apart from, perhaps, Peter) that pen was put to paper by the apostles ? Once exposed in print there is no need to comment further. The lie has been publicised. Commented Oct 22, 2025 at 21:47
  • Thanks, Nigel J. Gospel by Matthew is understood to have been written sometime between 60 AD and 80 AD much after the events of Acts took place. And Matthew mentions ' widely circulated to this very day .' I don't feel it is a casual remark . Commented Oct 23, 2025 at 0:29
  • 1
    @KadalikattJosephSibichan - Regardless of the exact date the Gospel of Matthew was written, its content draws from earlier sources or eyewitness accounts closely tied to the period of Jesus' ministry. As a result, Matthew preserves key historical facts. In contrast, the Book of Acts serves a different purpose: to document the development of the early Church within the broader Greco-Roman world, where many believers might never heard of this rumor. This specific details are no longer central to its narrative. Commented Oct 23, 2025 at 1:02
  • 2
    @KadalikattJosephSibichan : The late dating of the Gospels mainly hinges on one assumption: that they must have been written after 70 AD because Jesus could not have predicted the destruction of the Temple. However, even without invoking divinity, there are plenty of ways such a prediction could have been made, whether by a lucky guess, by observing the growing unrest and knowing it has happened before, or by using the Temple’s destruction symbolically to represent the demolition of old religious practices and the rise of new ones. Commented Oct 23, 2025 at 4:24

5 Answers 5

Reset to default
9

The "official" story of the soldiers guarding Jesus' tomb, ie, that the body was stolen by the disciples while the soldiers slept, would have been easily detected as fake for the following reasons:

  • if it were true, the soldiers failed and would have been executed for dereliction of duty - see a prime example of this in Acts 12:19 in their failure to keep Peter in prison. Thus, if the soldiers' story were true, there would be none left alive to repeat it!
  • the number of soldiers guarding the tomb amounted to a small company - it is impossible to keep a secret absolutely air-tight when so many are involved. They likely repeated the official line in public but told the truth to close associates and friends
  • If the soldiers had been asleep while the disciples stole the body, how would they know what happened? Thus, their story is not even internally consistent!

There were also a large number of people who saw Jesus alive:

  • Mary Magdalene was the first to see the empty tomb and later talk with Jesus at the tomb, John 20:1, 10-18, Mark 16:9-11. Several other women also saw the empty tomb, Luke 24:1-12, Matt 28:1, 5-8, Mark 16:1-8.
  • Two men, Cleopas and another on the Road to Emmaus, Luke 24:13-35, Mark 16:12, 13.
  • Jesus’ disciples in the upper room on that first Sunday evening, John 20:19-23, Matt 28:9, 10.
  • The disciples including doubting Thomas (a week later), John 20:24-31, Luke 24:36-49, Mark 16:14.
  • Peter and other disciples by the lake, John 21, 1 Cor 15:5.
  • More than 500 people/witnesses, including James, 1 Cor 15:6, 7.
  • The disciples at Jesus’ ascension, Acts 1:3-11, Luke 24:51-53, Matt 28:16-20, Mark 16:15-18.
  • The apostle Paul, 1 Cor 15:8.

As well as the direct evidence of the factual nature of Jesus’ death (as listed above) there is also the indirect evidence of Jesus’ resurrection including:

  • Women, including Mary Magdalene, were the first to witness to the resurrection. If the disciples had wanted to invent this story they would have placed men as the primary witnesses.
  • The soldiers guarding the tomb readily testified to Jesus’ resurrection – even though this made them liable to execution for failing on duty.
  • The Jewish leaders knew that Jesus had risen because they bribed the soldiers and bribed Pilate to say that Jesus’ body was simply stolen, Matt 28:13-15.
  • Later, the disciples were constantly talking about the death and resurrection of Jesus (Acts 2:32, 3:26, 4:10, 5:30, 10:40, 13:30, 34, 17:31, Rom 1:4, 4:24, 8:11, 10:9, 1 Cor 6:14, 15:4, 2 Cor 4:14, Gal 1:1, Col 2:20, 1 Thess 1:10, 2 Tim 2:8, Heb 13:20, 1 Peter 1:3, etc.) All the disciples were killed as martyrs except John (there were several attempts to kill him). This is not a story they would invent and then die for a fabricated lie.
  • The story of Jesus’ resurrection does not have any hallmarks of a fabricated story. If it had been invented it would involve a victorious political Messiah against Roman oppressors, not a dead hero! It would also NOT include a death in the most ignominious way by Roman oppressors such a crucifixion.
  • Many of the witnesses to the resurrection included almost all antagonistic people such as Pilate, the soldiers, the Jewish leaders and even the disciples themselves who did not believe it at first.
Improve this answer
1
  • 1
    Thanks, Dottard, for the scholarly inputs. I however, disagree on the point that the soldiers were prone to execution for dereliction of duty. They were deputed on the request of Jewish leaders and were guarding a dead body. Why would Rome care if the body got stolen ? Commented Oct 23, 2025 at 6:55
6

While they were going, behold, some of the guard went into the city and told the chief priests all that had taken place. 12 And when they had assembled with the elders and taken counsel, they gave a sufficient sum of money to the soldiers 13 and said, “Tell people, ‘His disciples came by night and stole him away while we were asleep.’ 14 And if this comes to the governor’s ears, we will satisfy him and keep you out of trouble.” 15 So they took the money and did as they were directed. And this story has been spread among the Jews to this day. (Matt. 28:11–15, ESV2016)

The chief priests were Sadducees. Thus, they didn't believe in the resurrection of the dead. They did not believe the soldiers' story and thought the soldiers were protecting themselves. So, the chief priests made up what they thought most likely happened and told the solders to say such paying them and giving them protection.

However, one problem, if the soldiers were sound enough asleep for the disciples to steal the body, how did the soldiers know that happened. Another problem is the soldiers saw what really happened. While officially they supported the chief priests' story, do you think they wouldn't tell their family and friends what really happened?

Many of the Jews therefore, who had come with Mary and had seen what he did raised Lazarus from the dead], believed in him, 46 but some of them went to the Pharisees and told them what Jesus had done. (John 11:45–46, ESV2016)

Many Jews had already seen and believed the miraculous.

For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures, 4 that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures, 5 and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. 6 Then he appeared to more than five hundred brothers at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have fallen asleep. 7 Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles. 8 Last of all, as to one untimely born, he appeared also to me. (1 Cor. 15:3–8, ESV2016)

Many people were eyewitnesses to the resurrected Christ. Christ's disciples did not show the boldness it would take to steal the body. Why would the disciples be willing to die for a lie. Essentially, the chief priests' story didn't make sense in view of the evidence.

Improve this answer
4

The false account spread by the soldiers at the instruction of the chief priests was essentially hearsay. At that time, the dissemination of such rumors was limited - without modern communication tools, they rarely traveled far and endured long. Unlike today's social media, which can amplify misinformation instantly and globally, hearsay in the ancient world had a much shorter shelf life.

Given that the Book of Acts was written at least thirty years after the event, it's likely that this rumor had already faded from public consciousness. Especially within the Greco-Roman world, the cultural and geographical context in which Acts was composed, the influence of that hearsay would have significantly diminished.

Improve this answer
1

The truth of Jesus' resurrection prevailed over the lie that his corpse was stolen (and remained a corpse) due to the same way all of God's truth prevails - the Holy Spirit that raised Christ continued to work through all the Christians to spread the truth.

The Apostles were foremost, and exemplary, in promoting the truth of Jesus' resurrection. This emboldened all Christians to follow suit, and the main means of resisting the satanic lie was verbal.

Today we think that written publications and digital outlets are the best way of debating and presenting a case, either for, or against. But the situation back then was entirely different. The quickest way to promote Christ as risen from the grave was by believers witnessing verbally about Christ being the Son of God, with some 500 eyewitnesses to him being alive:

"[Christ] was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, and that he appeared to Peter, and then to the Twelve. After that he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers at the same time, most of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep. Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles, and last of all he appeared to me also." 1 Corinthians 15:4-7 N.I.V.

This was after the Holy Spirit came upon 120 Christians at Pentecost. After Peter's preaching, some 3,000 Jews and proselytes gathered in Jerusalem became Christians, convinced of the resurrection of the Son of God (Acts 2:30-43, do read all of it). Also, Acts 4:33 says that it was with great power that the apostles witnessed of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus.

Many more texts could be used to show the explosive nature of how the Holy Spirit empowered Christian witnesses to Christ's resurrection to impact not only the Jewish people, but the Gentiles. The Apostles led 'the charge', with their written accounts following years after many thousands of people had believed the testimony from hundreds of eye-witnesses.

The Apostles prevailed by the Holy Spirit empowering them (and hundreds of other witnesses) to keep telling the truth, that Christ was risen from the dead.

Improve this answer
0

Read the gospel of Nicodemus. Even his enemies the chief priests accepted he had risen by the dead. Some wanted to say his disciples stole the body, and others said well that is fine but how do you explain how his soul came back into his dead body, and raised him to life lol.

Improve this answer

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.