Skip to main content

Questions tagged [modal-logic]

2 votes
1 answer
312 views

What to call schema $\forall xT\llcorner A\lrcorner\to T\llcorner\forall x A\lrcorner$ when one doesn't want "Barcan Formula"? And what is a good name for the schema $T\llcorner\exists x A\...
Frode Alfson Bjørdal's user avatar
10 votes
1 answer
537 views

I've been trying to understand what it means for a button to be pure in the context of the modal logic of forcing, and it would help to have an example of a button which is not a pure button. Based on ...
Hope Duncan's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
232 views

The original paper by Hamkins and Löwe that the modal logic of forcing is exactly S4.2 uses the fact that there is consistently a model with an independent collection of infinitely many buttons and ...
Hope Duncan's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
82 views

Take the distribution axiom, DA, of a modal logic to be: $\Box(A\to B)\to (\Box A \to \Box B).$ As there are distribution-free modal logics which do not have DA: What does DA correspond to in frames ...
Frode Alfson Bjørdal's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
237 views

I have a formula $\varphi$ of propositional modal logic or propositional intuitionistic logic, a finite Kripke frame $W$, and I would like to test whether $\varphi$ is valid in $W$. This is an ...
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 40.2k
3 votes
1 answer
236 views

In modal logics, the necessitation rule licences the inference from $\vdash p$ to $\vdash \Box p.$ Given a modal logic $\mathcal{L}$ with characteristic axioms in the set $\Sigma$, does the ...
Frode Alfson Bjørdal's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
71 views

Let $GL$ be the provability logic containing the axioms $K := \Box (\varphi\to \psi)\to (\Box \varphi\to \Box \psi)$ and $L := \Box(\Box \varphi \to \varphi)\to \Box \varphi$, along with the ...
Leonardo Pacheco's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
313 views

Are there any notable mathematical or logical issues within Christoph Benzmüller and Bruno Woltzenlogel-Paleo formalized Gödel's ontological proof (pdf) that has been identified by the community?
Hadibinalshiab's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
72 views

Given an arbitrary set of normal modal logics $\mathcal{L}$, one can define their sum $\bigoplus \mathcal{L}$ (or $\bigoplus_{L \in \mathcal{L}} L$ if you prefer) to be the least normal modal logic ...
beehive's user avatar
  • 21
6 votes
1 answer
500 views

I am looking for ways to internalize the modal operator of necessity $\Box$, ending up with a morphism $\Box: \Omega \to \Omega$ satisfying the necessitation rule (if $\phi$, then $\Box \phi$) and the ...
Miviska's user avatar
  • 63
4 votes
1 answer
307 views

A few days ago I stumbled upon this question on MS. The question is: Does the lattice of intermediate logics have an atom, i.e. an element that is strictly stronger than IPC but not strictly stronger ...
Navid Rashidian's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
203 views

For a given finite and rooted intuitionistic Kripke frame $\mathcal{F}$, let $\log(\mathcal{F})=\{\phi : \mathcal{F}\vDash \phi\}$ and assume $S=\{\log(\mathcal{F}): \mathcal{F} \text{ is finite and ...
4869's user avatar
  • 47
4 votes
0 answers
197 views

Given two Heyting algebras $A$ and $B$, let $A+B$ be their coproduct in the category of Heyting algebras. Is it true that the inclusion $A → A+B$ always has a left and a right adjoint ? (Actually, I ...
user713327's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
94 views

Call a partial order $\mathcal{F}=(F, \leq)$ rooted if there is an element $a \in F$ such that for any $b \in F$, $a\leq b$. Let $\mathcal{F}_0$ and $\mathcal{F}_1$ be two different finite rooted ...
4869's user avatar
  • 47
2 votes
0 answers
250 views

I’ve asked this same question on math.stackexchange.com, but haven’t received any answers. I ask this question in good faith, so I hope it meets this site’s standards. I have been spending the better ...
PW_246's user avatar
  • 184

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5
8