Skip to main content

Questions tagged [multiverse-of-sets]

9 votes
3 answers
1k views

I think almost all mathematicians would agree that the finitary statements (like those expressed in PRA) have defnite realist objective truth values. E.g. either there is a finite string of bits (an ...
Kaveh's user avatar
  • 5,856
9 votes
1 answer
787 views

To be clear, I am not a mathematics educated student and I can not follow the details of the technicality of the forcing extension, but I feel that I have a good understanding of the big picture (of ...
Arian's user avatar
  • 193
5 votes
0 answers
1k views

I would like to ask a question about the omega conjecture and its relationship with the V = Ultimate L axiom. In his lecture Prof. Hugh Woodin have stated that "Assuming the omega conjecture, ...
Pan Mrož's user avatar
  • 499
6 votes
1 answer
1k views

Work in a theory where the primitives are classes $X,Y,Z,\dots$, and class membership $X\in Y$, and add an individual constant $\mathcal{M}$ called 'the multiverse'. Classes $V$ which are members of ...
Alec Rhea's user avatar
  • 10.5k
18 votes
0 answers
2k views

Johnstones classic topos theory book talks at some length in its introduction about how category theory/topos theory suggest that we view the 'universe' in which mathematics takes place as consisting ...
Alec Rhea's user avatar
  • 10.5k
12 votes
1 answer
845 views

In some related MO questions like The set-theoretic multiverse as a (bi)category it is discussed how one might represent the multiverse (see The set-theoretic multiverse) in a category theoretic way, ...
FWE's user avatar
  • 223
24 votes
1 answer
1k views

The famous game-theoretic couple, Alice & Bob, live in the set-theoretic universe, $V$, a model of $ZFC$. Just like many other couples they sometimes argue over a statement, $\sigma$, expressible ...
Morteza Azad's user avatar
40 votes
7 answers
7k views

When I first read Set Theory by Jech, I came under the impression that the Universe of Sets, $V$ was a fixed, well defined object like $\pi$ or the Klein four group. However as I have read on, I am ...
Elie Ben-Shlomo's user avatar
26 votes
4 answers
4k views

In J.D. Hamkins' multiverse view of set theory, every universe has an ill-founded $\mathbb{N}$ from the perspective of another universe. Does this mean that every proof in our universe can be seen as ...
Guest154's user avatar
  • 285
20 votes
3 answers
3k views

A "truth" platonist for arithmetic believes, given a statement in the language of arithmetic, that the problem whether the statement is true has a definite answer. Prof. Hamkins has argued for a ...
AEWARG's user avatar
  • 271
3 votes
3 answers
641 views

I am curious whether or not the following axiom is independent of Hamkins's axioms for the Set-Theoretic Multiverse. Hamkins's axioms can be found here on pages 1-2 and here on pages 24-26. Consider ...
红色的头发's user avatar
9 votes
2 answers
2k views

The Mostowski collapse lemma (see here for a quick ref) is one of the key basic tools in the set-theory arsenal. I wonder if the collapse is natural, in the functorial sense. More precisely, is ...
Mirco A. Mannucci's user avatar
66 votes
3 answers
6k views

There is a (very) long essay by Grothendieck with the ominous title La Longue Marche à travers la théorie de Galois (The Long March through Galois Theory). As usual, Grothendieck knew what he was ...
Mirco A. Mannucci's user avatar
8 votes
2 answers
743 views

I read with interest both Hamkins Multiverse Axioms and Joyal and Moerdijk's algebraic set theory. Both of these perspectives takes a set-theory universe as an object, and consider collections of set-...
user avatar
10 votes
1 answer
2k views

I just had a look to the article The set theoretical multiverse by (mo user) J.D.Hamkins. Not being a logician and not knowing forcing techniques, I couldn't fully appreciate the mathematical ideas, ...
Qfwfq's user avatar
  • 23.8k

15 30 50 per page