I was involved with the following scenario. This scenario is an example of many scenarios like it. Many have been pointed out on a popular meta thread dealing with feelings of negativity on SO. Can we as a community do anything to mitigate this type of behavior or make behavior like this have some consequence?
Please review specifically the reason for edit on my answer.
Replace Quotations in records SQL Server
Here was the series of events:
- I post an answer.
- UNSPECIFIED USER (not OP) leaves a comment about my answer not meeting OP requirements.
- With UNSPECIFIED USERS's opinion at heart, I write another answer for the OP.
- UNSPECIFIED USER up-votes my new answer
- UNSPECIFIED USER leaves a comment that I can probably format it better
- I write back that I use tab indenting and suggest that pasting it into SSMS will show its formatted quite nicely. (Note: I do not disagree with his call for formatting)
- UNSPECIFIED USER writes another writes a comment back that there are settings in Visual Studio I should learn how to use to fix the format to his unspecified standard.
- I comment back and poll UNSPECIFIED USER how this format argument is helping the OP
- UNSPECIFIED USER removes his comments from my answer.
- UNSPECIFIED USER edits my answer so that he can downvote stating so, and downvotes.
Let's recap:
- UNSPECIFIED USER has not provided an answer himself
- OP has not made any indication to any of the answers provided.
- UNSPECIFIED USER has removed a vote from a good answer because he was challenged not about formatting specifically, but the value of additional formatting and my questioning him on asking why more is needed?
What's ultimately frustrating to me, is I have spent part of my day trying to help/encourage the OP towards a solution that was workable for his scenario only to arrive at petty formatting commentary by someone with the power to modify and coach the formatting towards a standard of his choosing. (without argument no less!)
EFF? (Google says 'Electronic Frontier Foundation')