Talk:Player

Hi, I note that the page have got recently protected so only administrators can edit it, Why? Full protection should not be needed without a notice before the page gets protected, and other users should also edit it. I DO NOT KNOW WHAT IT MAKED SO THIS PAGE HAVE GOT PROTECTED, AND ALSO FOR A LONG TIME. Please can an admin make the protection shorter or other editors must request edits to this page using this talk page. Any questions about this, ask them below. -- Philip57sundfors TALK CONTRIBUTIONS 09:53, 20 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

A user was making a controversial edit that kept getting reverted, so it was fully protected to prevent edit war. However, I do think full protection until 2019 is a bit overkill - in my opinion I think it should have been protected for a month, and a note should be left on that user's talk page. I don't think that only administrators should be able to edit it for almost a year just because of one dispute with one user.-- Madminecrafter12^{Talk to me} 02:33, 21 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Agreed - the fact that I can't remove a completely non-existent version from the page is annoying me quite a lot (thankfully it's a redlink). - MinecraftPhotos4U (talk) 12:38, 5 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Indeed, I would've just blocked them. A single bad editor shouldn't prevent everyone else from editing. –Majr ᐸ Talk
Contribs 12:44, 5 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Capopanzone has proposed the page be moved to Player for the following reason:
No other entity pages use "The" in their title, and "Player" is the in-game name for this entity (see string entity.minecraft.player)

 Oppose as it is referred to as the player in the End Poem. -BDJP ^(t|c) 21:01, 24 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

If it was part of the name, "the" would be capitalized. the entity is called "Player", since the end poem is directed at one player (the one who sees it), that player is referred to as "the" player.

The actual entity name (entity.minecraft.player) should also be preferred over usage in big strings of text. (In case it isn't clear, I actually  Support moving.) FVbico (talk) 21:10, 24 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

As FVbico pointed out, "the player" in that context is a generic term used inside a text, so obviously it receives articles and stuff like that. The actual entity name for the player entity is just "Player", and you can check that by searching for the string entity.minecraft.player in the en_us.json file in any version from 18w02a onwards. Using the article just because a sentence directed to the actual player uses "the" before "player" would be like saying that the Ender Dragon page should be named "The Ender Dragon" because the the description for "The End... Again" advancement uses "the Ender Dragon".--Capopanzone (talk) 19:26, 25 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

 Support For above reasons. It's always been silly that the player had a definite article in its page title. The player redirect page doesn't have any history besides its creation, so a move would be easy. – Jack McKalling [ ] 19:53, 25 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

 Support Is inline with similar moves that have happened. –Majr ᐸ Talk
Contribs 05:16, 26 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

It's been a week, so moved (also an excuse to test move tagging). –Majr ᐸ Talk
Contribs 01:30, 2 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Fix the bubble bar picture, as it shows red text. 111.88.15.200 10:44, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

It's not corrupted, it simply means that whatever text is red is (if 2 years ago) still nonexistent. TheWitheringSkeletonizedHuskyStrayStorm1999 09:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

So the player does not take damage for three seconds upon respawning from death; this can be noticeable if you're killed by zombified piglins, the gamerule ForgiveDeadPlayers is disabled, and your spawn point is near your death location

IS IT 76.64.52.246 01:49, 6 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Tested it, and it happens because the game thinks you were just hurt, like if you got hurt (without dying) normally. TheWitheringSkeletonizedHuskyStrayStorm1999 09:19, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Players that hold items are now visible in alpha v 1.0.6

Here's a link to an article They are going to be changing Steve and Alex, someone needs to reflect this by updating the images when it’s out --GamingBren (talk) 13:17, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

They slightly modified Steve’s appearance in 1.19.50, so it will be added soon. 1.158.238.102 11:10, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Article says Steve's shirt is light blue for some reason - isn't it technically cyan? In-game it's an almost identical match 71.53.130.38 14:51, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

I changed it to cyan. Amatulic (talk) 23:24, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

are the new 1.20 default skins gonna be added to the player wiki page

Steve gained back his beard --104.162.135.168 01:24, 19 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add the images of the 7 new skins, as well show the default arms. --104.162.135.168 21:15, 19 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Apparently Steve looks different. I changed one of my skins back to Steve in Bedrock and noticed he’s more detailed. This only affects 1.19.50 as far as I know. 1.158.238.102 10:59, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

With the new default skins out now, this page needs a massive update. Also, the arm size can now be changed for the default skins. --GamingBren (talk) 00:29, 8 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Would it be wise to make sections for each of the new skins? They haven’t gotten any official variants yet, so I don’t want to assume they’ll get enough in a short amount of time to justify each getting a blurb, but on the other hand it feels disrespectful to just lump their renders together. Realshow19 (talk) 23:28, 18 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

 Yes  working on it... --Simanelix ^(T|C) 05:23, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

In recent previews for Bedrock Edition, Steve has no beard! Is this really happening, or is Steve keeping his beard? 90.249.54.200 14:16, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wiki is not a site to report bugs. Please visit mojira to report this bug or search for more information.--Wilf233_zhMCW（论·功） 14:22, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sorry. |image=Steve_head.png 90.249.61.49

I believe that the nine default player skins should be split off from the player page to be consistent with how the spin-off namespaces treat such characters. The player page should just be about the player in general and in-game. Having separate pages for each of the default characters would allow space to explain more on how each one has been used by Mojang.

MCD:Steve and MCD:Alex in particular already have individual pages on the Dungeons namespace. I automatically  Support this as the proposer of this proposal.Drour1234 (talk) 09:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

 Support - A significant portion of the page isn't even about the player character Mudscape (talk) 23:44, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

 Support, but... this is a tricky split. This isn't as simple as taking Pickaxe and taking only the information relevant to the Diamond Pickaxe to make the new page, we'd be writing a new type of article that covers a promotional character. I think someone should make a pretty complete draft of a default skin page before we go and make all of them (thank you Realshow for making a Noor draft as I type this reply). - Harristic / Talk 23:54, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

 Realshow's Noor draft User:Realshow19/Noor -BrianGLHF (talk) 17:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hold on, the "It has been suggested that this page be split" info has been removed from the page Player. Why?

2A00:23C7:A5A2:2B01:14F9:70C7:6DCE:275C 17:15, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

The pages are already being worked on, should be finished in another few days. Realshow19 (talk) 17:16, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

The split pages don't exist yet. Why? 2A00:23C7:A5A2:2B01:50C4:D968:220D:DF 12:17, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

They’re still not done, give it time. There’s a lot to keep track of. Realshow19 (talk) 14:14, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

 Strong support Aside from what people have already said here, as the wiki starts to embrace the wider franchise more I think there should be a set standard for characters. There's already a good number of character pages, but they barely scratch the surface of how many there are, and the ones that are finished don't tend to feel like complete documents of their individual appearances. Realshow19 (talk) 19:32, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

 Strong support - plighting_engineerd (talk) 22:43, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

 Very strong support. (talk|contributions) 20:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

 Support -BrianGLHF (talk) 17:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nope. The skins is what players use, so splitting them as separate wiki pages will not make sense for the main things these skins are for, being unique. Please, don't do the split! 2A00:23C7:A5A2:2B01:F5E2:567C:839A:4CD4 13:50, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I don’t understand your reasoning, the page will still refer to Steve and the gang. The split pages will just cover the characters themselves, while the player page focuses on the literal player entity. Realshow19 (talk) 14:10, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Oh ok! But just keep mentioning Steve and the gang on the player wiki page. 2A00:23C7:A5A2:2B01:F5E2:567C:839A:4CD4 14:26, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps there can be a statement added to the policy page wherein any more new default skins that Mojang adds should have their own pages?Drour1234 (talk) 19:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I don't think that's necessary since the fact that they'll have their own pages already communicates to all editors that each default skin having their own page is the standard. - Harristic / Talk 22:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Title. This is clearly an artifact of the past, given that it first goes to a redirect page, but I can't quite figure out where it's supposed to lead. Anyone got anything? Davie53 (talk) 14:07, 13 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

I changed the link to NBT format#Usage. That section mentions that empty lists may have unexpected values, and is probably the intended link. The original link was to a non-existent section of a redirect page, so it just redirected to the top of NBT format. Rampage455 (talk) 14:50, 13 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Maybe we should protect this page... It's a popular one, so IP editors like to vandalize it. Maybe only Users should be able to edit it. 100.7.29.185 19:12, 20 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

 Support Every other time I see someone edit the page it’s a vandal. Realshow19 (talk) 19:16, 20 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Protection isn't necessary here and would just prevent constructive edits by new users. -- MarkusRost (talk) 19:23, 20 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

 Disagree per MarkusRost. Looking at the history, the last time there was vandalism or disruptive editing appears to have been 3 weeks ago, and the second most recent time is 5 weeks ago. Brewing, which was protected earlier today, is a good example of when to protect a page. That page usually gets vandalized at least 1 to 2 times a week when it's not protected, and more than half of the recent changes are vandalism. Rampage455 (talk) 19:40, 20 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Subjective + you don't need anyone's approval or consent to upload multiplayer screenshots to this wiki. Arina (she/her) 14:14, 20 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

No. Player refers to the in-game entity. i.e. the thing in the game. You're robot controlling the game is not part of the game. So, "player" here actually means "the player character". Not the thing playing the game. --Simanelix ^(T|C) 01:29, 2 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Maybe folks should talk it out whether those belong here or not instead of undoing each others undo revisions. Wormbo (talk) 07:25, 31 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

I  Oppose them being there, as they are already on the skins' respective pages. amethyst_hhh 07:31, 31 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

 Oppose per amethyst. They'd take up too much space on this page. == Rout | Talk 09:23, 31 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

 Oppose. We should only include the default skins, not how they are customized by the player. We don't include the 4 different skin scalings on Bedrock either, even though it is a similar customization. MinecraftBedrockPlayer7 (talk) (contribs) 09:28, 31 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

 Oppose If there’s going to be more than one image of each character there it should be the Bedrock version, not secondary customization. They already have their own pages for a reason. Realshow19 (talk) 13:33, 31 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

 Oppose, see my edit summary for the edit that removed them for why. NmF (talk) 16:05, 31 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

This part This article is about the entity controlled by the real person when playing Minecraft. For the removed passive mob, see Mob (entity). For the removed hostile mob, see Monster (entity).

I think it should have something about the new mannequin Like

if you’re looking for the entity from java edition see mannequin

or something like that just a suggestion Copper Monstrosity(talk) 18:34, 1 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

The hatnote? Add the mannequin thing yourself. NmF (talk) 19:06, 1 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

K Copper Monstrosity(talk) 19:06, 1 November 2025 (UTC)Reply