20

As the USA is one of the largest oil exporters in the world, apparently higher oil prices should be good for them, as they export the same amount of oil but can charge more for each barrel.

But, the recent increase in oil prices due to the war in Iran seems to be considered bad for the USA. Why?

Is it because the price increase only benefits the oil production companies in the USA, while most of the voters lose as they have to pay more for petroleum? If this is the reason: why cannot the USA government balance this out by charging some tax from the extra gains of the oil production companies, and using the tax to subsidize oil for the citizens? This should be a win-win for everyone, as the oil companies would still make a higher profit than usual.

QUESTION: Can the USA, as a large exporter of oil, do anything that will make it gain from the increase in oil prices?

9
  • 7
    "why cannot the USA government balance this out by charging some tax from the extra gains of the oil production companies, and using the tax to subsidize oil for the citizens?" It could but so far hasn't. Whoever owns the oil production in the US actually profits. So however owns ExxonMobile and Chevron and all the others. Probably some billionaires around the world. Commented Apr 8 at 22:17
  • 4
    The US had an oil export ban until 2015. But reimposing it in order to cap domestic prices would have downsides, not in the least signaling that the US is an unreliable exporter (say like Russia). The other re-distributive policies don't happen because oilmen are a core GOP constituency and GOP also loves to hit on socialism. Commented Apr 9 at 1:22
  • 3
    There are logistical issues too. The US actually has a poor internal infrastructure for moving oil, esp, from the East Coast (and the Gulf of Mexico/America) to the West coast. The US north-west gets oil from Canada. I'm not sure where California gets it from, but they also don't have enough refineries. They import gasoline from the Bahamas, which in turn imports oil from the Gulf of M/A, in part. Commented Apr 9 at 1:34
  • 5
    The modern US wouldn't be the modern US if they even considered policies that'd put their people above the interests of corporations Commented Apr 9 at 10:23
  • 4
    America? Tax excess profits from a big company and give the money to citizens? You have to be kidding, right? Commented Apr 11 at 0:26

6 Answers 6

18

Oil is fungible: if the price goes up somewhere, producers will arbitrage selling there (absent restrictions on exports, which are claimed to have their own problems). It would be very hard to subsidize on short notice, hard to put in place via windfall taxes against oil lobbyists, hard to reverse once put in place and costly to administer technically and in practice, especially considering US federalism. Last, quite bizarre in a nominally free market economy. Sure, some oil producing countries subsidize gas heavily. But on balance they are not especially well run countries. So... higher prices, which pisses off drivers of big SUVs and trucks (MAGA's demographic).

What's going on with shipping YouTube 3:45 in and talks about precisely the source of pricing pressure. Dude has been killing it covering Hormuz for the last 4 weeks, probably 10x his channel subscribers since the war started (or at least since the Houthis started sniping). Lots of solid coverage about the shipping impact, knows his subject.

What he says: the US competes on world commodity markets for a whole bunch of stuff that has become a lot expensive: oil, fertilizer, helium.

Some oil still gets imported, depending on the region: What Drives California’s Gasoline Prices?

Imported crude and refined oil can come from domestic sources, but the majority comes from Asia, Africa, South America, and the Middle East. Overseas supply can take three weeks to arrive at California marine terminals, isolating California oil refineries and fuel distribution centers by time and distance. As a result, price spikes triggered by unplanned refinery outages or international supply shocks may last longer for Californians because resupply time is longer.

Imported gasoline and blending components accounted for 19 percent of supply in 2025. Supplies of gasoline and diesel fuel from outside the state are routinely needed to balance supply with demand.

One more item comes to mind: Canada's Pierre Trudeau had a plan to transfer wealth out of Alberta's oil by selling oil more cheaply domestically, the New Energy Program.

Created under the Liberal government of Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau on October 28, 1980, following the two oil crises of the 1970s, the NEP had three main objectives: increase ownership of the oil industry by Canadians; price energy fairly for Canadian consumers; and provide Canadian energy self-sufficiency. The NEP was also designed to promote lower prices through price controls; promote exploration for oil in Canada; promote alternative energy sources; and increase federal government revenues from oil sales through a variety of taxes and revenue-sharing with the oil-producing Western Canadian provinces.

40+ years later, Albertans still hate the Fed Liberals about it. While it's not an exact fit, the idea of "making oil cheaper for all Americans" still somewhat implies transferring wealth out of the oil patches (typically Republican states) to the rest of the country.

p.s. Just to be clear: Yes, oil prices are a problem even for the USA. Still, the current oil prices, and strait out supply situation, is significantly worse for many other countries.

moving from the theoretical to proof-in-the-pudding

(this is from US government's own reporting, showing changes from February 2026 to March 2026)

US consumer inflation hot in March amid record surge in gasoline prices | Reuters

The Consumer Price Index jumped 0.9% last month, the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics said, the largest increase since June 2022, ⁠when prices soared in response to the Russia-Ukraine war. Consumer prices rose 0.3% in February. Last month's increase was in line with economists' expectations.

A 21.2% jump in gasoline prices, the largest since the government started consistently tracking the series in 1967, accounted for nearly three quarters of the monthly ​increase in the CPI. Other motor fuels, which include diesel, also soared by a record 30.8%.

5
  • If the oil companies can choose between (1) cease-fire, oil prices drop to 60 USD; (2) no cease-fire, oil prices rise to 100 USD, and there is a 20% tax; wouldn't option (2) be more profitable for them? Commented Apr 9 at 11:55
  • 3
    @ErelSegal-Halevi You won't pass a law (and one opposed by the oil lobby and Republicans), and provide a rebate/price cut in time to fix this crisis. At most the govt could cut checks and send them off to everyone and collect tax later. The industry would probably balk at the precedent of a 20% tax as well, especially if it had any chance of not being removed as soon as the crisis was over. The industry is just fine with $100 and no tax. Taxes are unpopular everywhere and nowhere more than in the US. Commented Apr 9 at 15:33
  • Also, there is an impeachment pending, and ending the recess would put this on the agenda as well. Commented Apr 10 at 7:58
  • @SimonRichter LOL another impeachment? Will the Dems learn to be serious, rather than cosplaying? Commented Apr 10 at 16:36
  • “So... higher prices, which pisses off drivers of big SUVs and trucks (MAGA's demographic)” => I live in one of the most liberal cities in America and most people drive an SUV or some other large vehicle. Other than a few tiny pockets of urbanism fans, Americans of every party love big, comfortable cars. Commented Apr 13 at 18:01
11

This isn't just about US consumers buying oil, gasoline, and diesel fuel. The cost of oil figures into the prices of many other products and services, such as fertilizer, trucking and air travel.

In addition, it impacts costs incurred by manufacturers abroad, which they will pass on as higher prices for the products we import. This is similar to the effect of the tariffs, except the increased costs don't go to the US treasury, they go to the foreign suppliers.

2
  • 1
    Interesting. Does it mean that, effectively, the USA imports oil indirectly, through other products that require oil for their production? Is it possible to estimate the amount of effective/indirect oil import? Commented Apr 9 at 19:49
  • 2
    You could say that, but more basically it points out how complex and interconnected all the dependency relations are. Commented Apr 9 at 20:11
7

It affects how much everything costs.

Unfortunately, modern society runs on oil.

  • Unless you have an electric car, driving burns gasoline or diesel. Americans drive an inordinately large amount; many of our urban areas date to the 1950s-60s, so they tend not to be conducive to walking or bicycling.
  • If you want to move products around the continental U.S., you largely have four options: trains (which burn diesel), airplanes (which burn large amounts of aviation fuel), river barges (which burn petroleum, albeit relatively efficiently), and tractor-trailers (which burn diesel.)
  • Over the past 40-ish years we have exported most of our consumer goods production to take advantage of cheap labor in Asia. To get to the U.S.A., these goods have to be shipped via freighters (which burn petroleum.)
  • There are many industrial processes (especially plastics production) which consume petroleum distillates as a raw material.
  • Most farmers (except for a small number of extremists such as the Amish) use tractors. These burn diesel.

As a couple other people have pointed out, oil price fluctuations have an outsized impact on the poor. Relatively small changes in the prices of basic necessities such as food and electricity make the difference between comfortable poverty and living hand-to-mouth. Further exacerbating the problem, our offshoring of consumer goods manufacturing especially effected lower-end products such as cheap clothing (which, by the way, is usually at least partially made of polyester plastic.)

5
  • You should - And ordinary Americans don't like when every day items become more and more costly (unaffordable). Thus, from the politicians perspective, high oil prices are bad because it makes people angry at them and costs them votes. Commented Apr 11 at 10:28
  • “Americans drive an inordinately large amount” => that’s a myth, see webfs.oecd.org/els-com/Family_Database/…. Americans have some of the shortest commutes in the developed world. There are stories about “super commuters” and whatnot but the average American doesn’t do that much driving on a daily basis. Commented Apr 13 at 18:06
  • 1
    @JonathanReez: You're confusing "shortest" with "briefest". Private car ownership = more driving and also leads to less time commuting -- no travel to a transit hub, no waiting for the particular shared conveyance to leave, no time transferring between bus and subway. The world-wide amount of driving, median per capita, is zero. Commented 17 hours ago
  • @BenVoigt you are right, but my point still stands that Americans don't really drive all that much. Europeans love to imagine the insane American commutes, but that's just cope. Commented 13 hours ago
  • @JonathanReez: Indeed, if Europeans think that Americans writ large travel significantly more than they do, that's overactive imagination. But we do drive more, because a much greater fraction of said travel is by personal vehicle, and so the answer reasonably says the typical American adult is more affected by the price at the pump. Commented 11 hours ago
5

Oil has many types. The US produces a specific type, and needs to import other types.

See:

There are hundreds of varieties of crude oil around the world. Different types of oil require different refining processes to make the fuels we need in the quantities we need. Many American refineries need heavier crudes than what is largely produced in the United States.

  • Crude oils have different viscosities or “gravities.” “Heavy” crude oil is more viscous, while “light” crude oil is thinner.
  • Crude oils also have different sulfur content. Low-sulfur crude is called “sweet” and high-sulfur crude is called “sour.”
  • Refineries run on a mix of crude oils in order to run efficiently and maximize outputs. Nearly 70% of U.S. refining capacity runs most efficiently with heavier crude. That is why 90% of crude oil imports into the United States are heavier than U.S.-produced shale crude.

The different types of oil of course have different prices. If the heavier crude oils rise in price, the US, as an importer, suffers accordingly.

3
  • 1
    While that's true, it doesn't really Commented Apr 10 at 15:05
  • Isn't the price of heavier crude oil correlated with the price of ligher crude oil? Commented Apr 11 at 17:57
  • @ErelSegal-Halevi Presumably the point is it's good for some people and not good for everyone else. Commented Apr 12 at 13:15
3

Because the US imports a large amount of oil, in 2025, an average of 7.9 million barrels per day were imported. While the US is a major oil producer, a lot is exported to other markets.

This is likely due to the type and quality of oil produced domestically versus internationally.

Is the US a bigger oil importer or exporter?

In 2025, the US exported more crude oil and petroleum products than it imported.

Petroleum and petroleum product exports totaled about 10.7 million barrels per day, while imports were about 7.9 million barrels a day. That’s a -2.8 million barrel a day difference.

Crude oil is a fossil fuel that can be refined into petroleum products such as jet fuel and gasoline. The US used to consistently import more petroleum and crude oil than it exported. But exports exceeded imports starting in October 2019. It’s been a net exporter in all but seven months since then.

This matters because it directly impacts the price of gas.

Graphic: Track U.S. and state gas prices National gas prices hit an average of $4 per gallon in March, the highest since 2022.

Gas prices in the United States, up more than 30% since the U.S. and Israel launched the war, have soared as the global oil supply constricts.

Now at a national average of more than $4 per gallon, according to data from motor club AAA, this price increase is straining already-stretched budgets in households across the country.

Some major US airlines may ‘not survive’ unless oil prices come down soon, experts warn

Some airlines could suffer major losses amid rising oil prices, according to industry leaders and experts.

The ongoing war with Iran has driven up oil prices worldwide, which means airlines are paying more than expected for fuel. As prices continue to rise, United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby warned some airlines might “not survive,” according to The Los Angeles Times.

10
  • 1
    This essentially says that historically high oil prices were bad for the US because they were a net importer but since 2019 the US is a net exporter so overall high oil prices should be beneficial to the US. Commented Apr 9 at 6:24
  • @quarague Why would higher import oil prices be good for anyone who has to pay for it? The price increase on imports raises the costs for everyone purchasing oil in the country. It is even causing some businesses to go under. Commented Apr 9 at 13:04
  • The US has a strategic imperative to establish and maintain "higher" oil prices. Higher prices mean increased revenue for producers. The US wants to incentivize internal production to reduce reliance on external producers. Kissinger referred to the strategy as the "floor plan". However "critics argue that the floor plan is mainly aimed at getting the rest of the industrial world to safeguard a big U.S. investment in costlier sources of energy". time.com/archive/6846593/… Commented Apr 10 at 8:23
  • @GregAskew Higher revenue doesn't mean much to the consumer market, to consumers paying higher prices, or to the businesses being impacted by those prices. Not to mention, higher domestic production is meaningless if that production is exported. Having a large amount of imports and exports shows that we can't depend on domestic production. Commented Apr 10 at 13:25
  • 1
    Consumers don't directly determine the price increases. The question asks "why are higher oil prices bad for the US". But the oil embargo resulted in the creation of the strategic petroleum reserve, and strategic investments, incentives, and policy changes that resulted in the US hedging their position to mitigate the impact of weaponized price shifts by OPEC countries. High price bad low price good is a herd spawned assumption that ignores the subtleties of these mechanisms that shape the impulsive elastic price increases. Commented Apr 10 at 14:57
3

The crude oil that the USA extracts from its own subterranean reservoirs is light grade crude oil. US oil refineries can only process heavier grade crude oils. Consequently, US refineries cannot process US domestic crude oil, only imported heavy crude oil.

The US sells its lighter crude abroad and imports heavier crude from abroad. In doing so it buys oil at the market rate. The increase in cost is passed on to domestic consumers of the oil, which then raises prices on all manner of goods and services which rely on such oil. This increases inflation and ordinary Americans experience a higher cost of living.

The sale of lighter crude oil abroad benefits the stock holders of the companies extracting and selling the oil. No benefit is passed on to ordinary Americans.

The United States produces lighter crude oil, imports heavier crude oil

Why the U.S Can’t Use the Oil it Produces

1
  • Isn't the price of heavier crude oil correlated with the price of ligher crude oil? Commented Apr 11 at 17:57

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.