9

According to Article 4 of CSTO

If one of the Member States undergoes aggression (armed attack menacing to safety, stability, territorial integrity and sovereignty), it will be considered by the Member States as aggression (armed attack menacing to safety, stability, territorial integrity and sovereignty) to all the Member States of this Treaty.

In case of aggression commission (armed attack menacing to safety, stability, territorial integrity and sovereignty) to any of the Member States, all the other Member States at request of this Member State shall immediately provide the latter with the necessary help, including military one, as well as provide support by the means at their disposal in accordance with the right to collective defence pursuant to article 51 of the UN Charter.

So, During the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War (which Azerbaijan won), have any of the CSTO members given an official reason for not following what's laid down in theory? What were the practical constraints in providing military aid to Armenia (for Russia especially)?

0

3 Answers 3

9

While Russia opposed a military resolution, its position has always been that Nagorno-Karabakh is legally part of Azerbaijan. For example, Putin publicly stated that Nagorno-Karabakh is part of Azerbaijan in a press conference after the 2020 ceasefire. In a statement on 5 October 2023, shortly after the conflict, Putin stated that Armenia itself recognized Nagorno-Karabakh as Azerbaijani territory (translation mine):

"In Prague in the autumn of 2022, under the auspices of Mr. Charles Michel, French President Emmanuel Macron and Mr. Olaf Scholz, the German Chancellor, the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan met. And there they signed a statement, from which it follows that Armenia recognized Karabakh as part of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Moreover, the leaders of the delegation, the leaders of Armenia, explicitly named the territory of Azerbaijan in square kilometers, which without any doubt includes Karabakh. And they stressed that they recognize the sovereignty of Azerbaijan within the boundaries of the Azerbaijan SSR, which was once part of the USSR. And as everyone knows, Karabakh was also part of the Azerbaijani SSR. In fact, the main, absolutely key issue, which was the status of Karabakh, was resolved," the Russian president said.

Putin noted that when Karabakh declared its independence, no one recognized this independence, not even Armenia. "Which, to be honest, is strange to me, but nevertheless, they made the decision not to recognize the independence of Karabakh. But here in Prague, they recognized that Karabakh belongs to Azerbaijan. And then in early 2023 repeated the same thing at an analogous meeting in Brussels. By the way, no one told us about this, I personally found out from the press. But Azerbaijan has always believed that Karabakh is part of its territory," the Russian head of state added.

Putin called the recent events in Karabakh an inevitable consequence of Armenia's recognition of this region as part of Azerbaijan. "Karabakh officially became part of Azerbaijan, this is the position of the modern Armenian state. Well, what should we do?" He said. "Everything that happened in the recent past, 2-3 weeks ago, and the closure of the Lachin corridor and so on, all this was inevitable after the recognition of Azerbaijan's sovereignty over Karabakh. It was only a matter of time before Azerbaijan would establish constitutional order there within the framework of the constitution of the Azerbaijani state." Source

In short, Putin's publicly stated position is that Nagorno-Karabakh was never claimed by anybody to be part of Armenia, that its self-proclaimed independence was never recognized even by Armenia (both of which are true), and therefore that the attacks on Nagorno-Karabakh in 2020 and 2023 were an internal Azerbaijani matter, and never an attack on Armenia at all. Therefore, Russian peacekeepers (as described by Putin later in the statement) were limited to protecting civilians and providing humanitarian aid, and had no grounds to take any further action to defend the territory.

Note that while the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War usually refers to the 2020 conflict, this statement is regarding Azerbaijan's eventual successful conquest in 2023. But this was the culmination of a long-term policy regarding in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. For example, in 2020 the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in response to a request from Armenia issued a statement that "In accordance with this treaty, Russia will provide the necessary assistance to Armenia if hostilities spread directly to the territory of Armenia."

2
  • I believe the international community in general never recognized NK as part of Armenia so Putin's not straying very far from international norms in this particular instance. Commented Apr 23 at 15:52
  • 1
    @ItalianPhilosopher that is correct. NK was recognized only by a few other ex-Soviet breakaway states and no UN members. Commented Apr 23 at 18:12
7

Nagorno-Karabakh was not recognized by Armenia or Russia as a part of Armenia nor as an independent state.

Thus, de iure and de facto, Azerbaijan attacked an unrecognized state within its international borders, and won.

Azerbaijan did not attack Armenia, as Armenian official position was that Armenian army is not present in Nagorno-Karabakh.

Thus, there was not much Russia was supposed to do. Attack Azerbaijan inside its recognized borders? Russia could recognize Artsakh like it did with Abkhazia/SO and LDNR later, but since it was somebody other's client unrecognized state, the calculation wasn't working very well fot it.

4
  • 2
    "Azerbaijan attacked an unrecognized state within its international borders" So... like Ukraine was supposedly doing to Donbas in 2022 then, according to Herr Putin? Upvoted tho, answers the question. Commented Apr 23 at 15:54
  • 2
    @ItalianPhilosopher Russia has recognized LDNR on 21 February 2022 then entered the war as their ally. Russia has never recognized Artsakh nor it was obliged to, at least without Armenia doing so first. Commented Apr 23 at 17:17
  • "Azerbaijan did not attack Armenia" According to this Wikipedia article, Azerbaijan did attack and continues to occupy several areas in Armenia proper, though this may have been from after the war in question. Commented Apr 26 at 1:56
  • Armenia also holds small bits and pieces ot Azerbaijan. Short spans of H-58 vital Armenian transport artery go over Azerbaijan territory. This is outside of zone of conflict so barely relevant. Commented Apr 26 at 12:15
6

The Russian line on this seems to be that they determined that the "necessary help" only amounted to “military-technical assistance” and the deployment of a monitoring mission to the border. This offer was turned down by Armenia (which wanted a full military response from Russia). Russia claims that its offer fulfilled its treaty obligations, and a military response was not required. See (Armenia’s Membership In Russian-Led Defense Bloc ‘Frozen’

You will note that the language of the treaty allows for some wriggle-room. It doesn't promise a military response, only that the support could include military actions. You are free to speculate if the leaders of the CSTO really believed that technical support would have been sufficient for Armenia to retain Nagorno-Karabakh, or whether they simply decided that this land wasn't worth their soldiers fighting for. Of course they aren't going to state that kind of thing explicitly.

Of course, Armenia takes a very different view of this from Russia. They consider the CSTO members to have failed in their treaty obligations and have "frozen" their membership of the CSTO.

3
  • 3
    I don't know if Russia or the other CSTO members raised the argument, but technically Azerbaijan didn't attack Armenia. Nagorno-Karabakh was, de iure, an internationally recognized part of Azerbaijan. After the conflicts in 2020, a Russia-backed ceasefire was imposed, which nominally obligated Armenia to cede back the territory to Azerbaijan. Commented Apr 23 at 6:10
  • 1
    Yes the second N-K war was the conflict in 2020, and the outcome was the ceasefire (essentially a surrender by Armenia) Prior to that war, the situation was less clear, with Armenia having effective control of the region. I forget Russia's attitude between 1990 and 2020 with regard to N-K Commented Apr 23 at 6:24
  • @Rekesoft Yes, Russia used exactly this argument in both 2020 and 2023, see my answer below. Commented Apr 23 at 8:42

You must log in to answer this question.