385

I've started using webpack2 (to be precise, v2.3.2) and after re-creating my config I keep running into an issue I can't seem to solve I get (sorry in advance for ugly dump):

ERROR in ./src/main.js
Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'components/DoISuportIt' in '[absolute path to my repo]/src'
resolve 'components/DoISuportIt' in '[absolute path to my repo]/src'
  Parsed request is a module
  using description file: [absolute path to my repo]/package.json (relative path: ./src)
    Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration
    aliased with mapping 'components': '[absolute path to my repo]/src/components' to '[absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt'
      using description file: [absolute path to my repo]/package.json (relative path: ./src)
        Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration
      after using description file: [absolute path to my repo]/package.json (relative path: ./src)
        using description file: [absolute path to my repo]/package.json (relative path: ./src/components/DoISuportIt)
          as directory
            [absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt doesn't exist
          no extension
            Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration
            [absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt doesn't exist
          .js
            Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration
            [absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt.js doesn't exist
          .jsx
            Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration
            [absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt.jsx doesn't exist
[[absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt]
[[absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt]
[[absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt.js]
[[absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt.jsx]

package.json

{
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "main": "./src/main.js",
  "scripts": {
    "build": "webpack --progress --display-error-details"
  },
  "devDependencies": {
    ...
  },
  "dependencies": {
    ...
  }
}

In terms of the browser field it's complaining about, the documentation I've been able to find on this is: package-browser-field-spec. There is also webpack documentation for it, but it seems to have it turned on by default: aliasFields: ["browser"]. I tried adding a browser field to my package.json but that didn't seem to do any good.

webpack.config.js

import path from 'path';
const source = path.resolve(__dirname, 'src');

export default {
  context: __dirname,
  entry: './src/main.js',
  output: {
    path: path.resolve(__dirname, 'dist'),
    filename: '[name].js',
  },
  resolve: {
    alias: {
      components: path.resolve(__dirname, 'src/components'),
    },
    extensions: ['.js', '.jsx'],
  },
  module: {
    rules: [
      {
        test: /\.(js|jsx)$/,
        include: source,
        use: {
          loader: 'babel-loader',
          query: {
            cacheDirectory: true,
          },
        },
      },
      {
        test: /\.css$/,
        include: source,
        use: [
          { loader: 'style-loader' },
          {
            loader: 'css-loader',
            query: {
              importLoader: 1,
              localIdentName: '[path]___[name]__[local]___[hash:base64:5]',
              modules: true,
            },
          },
        ],
      },
    ],
  },
};

src/main.js

import DoISuportIt from 'components/DoISuportIt';

src/components/DoISuportIt/index.jsx

export default function() { ... }

For completeness, .babelrc

{
  "presets": [
    "latest",
    "react"
  ],
  "plugins": [
    "react-css-modules"
  ],
  "env": {
    "production": {
      "compact": true,
      "comments": false,
      "minified": true
    }
  },
  "sourceMaps": true
}

What am I doing wrong/missing?

4
  • 80
    I love all the "in my case" answers. Just goes to show how terrible of a tool Webpack still is. Imagine returning a single generic error for various "in my case" scenarios! Commented Sep 29, 2020 at 13:46
  • 50
    I still don't understand Webpack after years of using it Commented Sep 1, 2021 at 0:36
  • for me, I had put resolve in modules instead of the root config Commented Feb 27, 2023 at 2:25
  • 1
    I have never seen a worst error than this. trying from last 2 hours still not able to figure out what can be cause!! Commented Jan 31, 2024 at 15:39

48 Answers 48

358

Turned out to be an issue with Webpack just not resolving an import - talk about horrible horrible error messages :(

// I Had to change:
import DoISuportIt from 'components/DoISuportIt';

// to (notice the missing `./`)
import DoISuportIt from './components/DoISuportIt';
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

10 Comments

Is the issue caused by npm ? Today I upgraded a module using npm, by uninstalling and installing a latest version of module, Now I got this error and the error tells to change the relative location of module, but the list of files is bit high, what caused all these files to change its relative position?
This also saved my ass. It's somewhat counter intuitive that in the sass files you can import with 'folder' but in .js files you need to do it like './folder' . Also without --display-error-details there's NO error message what so ever, it just crashes
@Matthew Herbst one of the stupidest error messages:) my ass is saved, thx!
Still in almost 2022 in webpack 5 the same terrible error messages. No progress from v4 to v5 in thi way?
Cleary there is no right answer. This means that webpack has done a terrible job with error handling and need to make improvements.
|
103

Just for record, because I had similiar problem, and maybe this answer will help someone: in my case I was using library which was using .js files and I didn't had such extension in webpack resolve extensions. Adding proper extension fixed problem:

module.exports = {
  // ...
  resolve: {
    extensions: ['.ts', '.js'],
  }
}

2 Comments

Silly me.. I forgot to add the resolver property. Thank you :)
This is also the error you get if you mess up your configuration file's entry points or the file referenced there doesn't exist.
41

I'm building a React server-side renderer and found this can also occur when building a separate server config from scratch. If you're seeing this error, try the following:

  1. Make sure your entry value is properly pathed relative to your context value. Mine was missing the preceeding ./ before the entry file name.
  2. Make sure you have your resolve value included. Your imports on anything in node_modules will default to looking in your context folder, otherwise.

Example:

const serverConfig = {
name: 'server',
context: path.join(__dirname, 'src'),
entry: {serverEntry: ['./server-entry.js']},
output: {
    path: path.join(__dirname, 'public'),
    filename: 'server.js',
    publicPath: 'public/',
    libraryTarget: 'commonjs2'
},
module: {
    rules: [/*...*/]
},
resolveLoader: {
    modules: [
        path.join(__dirname, 'node_modules')
    ]
},
resolve: {
    modules: [
        path.join(__dirname, 'node_modules')
    ]
}
};

Comments

33

I encountered this error in a TypeScript project. In my webpack.config.js file I was only resolving TypeScript files i.e.

resolve: {
    extensions: [".ts"],
}

However I noticed that the node_module which was causing the error:

Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration

did not have any ".ts" files (which is understandable as the module has been converted to vanilla JS. Doh!).

So to fix the issue I updated the resolve declaration to:

resolve: {
    extensions: [".ts", ".js"],
}

1 Comment

You can also use "..." at the end of extensions to include the defaults.
21

I had the same issue, but mine was because of wrong casing in path:

// Wrong - uppercase C in /pathCoordinate/
./path/pathCoordinate/pathCoordinateForm.component

// Correct - lowercase c in /pathcoordinate/
./path/pathcoordinate/pathCoordinateForm.component

Comments

17

Add this to your package.json:

"browser": {
  "[module-name]": false   
},

3 Comments

i coder should read the documentation first, i always search in stackoverflow but nowadays i prefer to read documentation first. thanks for editing...
I have solved the problem with the main.js, neverthless I have the next error: Error during loading: Uncaught TypeError: fs.existsSync is not a function in localhost:9876/_karma_webpack_/vendor.js line 110252 Do you have any idea about this?
@kimo_ouz - Absolutely brilliant! Thank you for introducing me to the "browser" field world. Here are some links for other interested people: insides of the webpack-package.json relationship and NPM official notes
10

This also occurs when the webpack.config.js is simply missing (dockerignore 🤦‍♂️)

2 Comments

when running npm run build i had to modify the build script in package.json to reference the correct webpack configuration file "build": "webpack --mode production --config webpack/webpack.config.prod.js";
I also saw this when someone accidentally had webpackconfig.js instead of webpack.config.js.
10

In my case it was a package that was installed as a dependency in package.json with a relative path like this:

"dependencies": {
  // ...
  "phoenix_html": "file:../deps/phoenix_html"
},

and imported in js/app.js with import "phoenix_html"

This had worked but after an update of node, npm, etc... it failed with the above error-message.

Changing the import line to import "../../deps/phoenix_html" fixed it.

1 Comment

Oh no, why Webpack is so unintuitive at this, your thoughts? I also have local dependency.
9

I changed my entry to:

entry: path.resolve(__dirname, './src/js/index.js'),

and it worked.

1 Comment

changed it from what?
8

I had aliases into tsconfig.json:

{
  "compilerOptions": {
    "paths": {
      "@store/*": ["./src/store/*"]
    }
  },
}

So I solved this issue by adding aliases to webpack.config also:

module.exports = {
  //...
  resolve: {
    alias: {
      '@store': path.resolve(__dirname, '../src/store'),
    },
  },
};

Comments

8

I was getting the same error and I didn't want absolute imports. My normal relative import was not working with the same error and "module not found".

I was missing this in my webpack config.

resolve: {
  extensions: ['.tsx', '.ts', '.js'],
}

Comments

7

My case was rather embarrassing: I added a typescript binding for a JS library without adding the library itself.

So if you do:

npm install --save @types/lucene

Don't forget to do:

npm install --save lucene

Kinda obvious, but I just totally forgot and that cost me quite some time.

Comments

7

I got same problem and fixed with adding file extension.

// Old:
import RadioInput from './components/RadioInput'

// New:
import RadioInput from './components/RadioInput.vue'

Also, if you still want to use without extensions, you can add this webpack config: (Thanx for @matthew-herbst for the info)

module.exports = {
  //...
  resolve: {
    extensions: ['.js', '.json', '.wasm'], // Add your extensions here.
  },
};

1 Comment

You should be able to not need the extension if you pass the custom resolve.extensions: webpack.js.org/configuration/resolve/#resolveextensions
5

In my case, it was due to a broken symlink when trying to npm link a custom angular library to consuming app. After running npm link @authoring/canvas

"@authoring/canvas": "path/to/ui-authoring-canvas/dist"

It appear everything was OK but the module still couldn't be found:

Error from npm link

When I corrected the import statement to something that the editor could find Link:

import {CirclePackComponent} from '@authoring/canvas/lib/circle-pack/circle-pack.component';

I received this which is mention in the overflow thread:

Field Browser doesn't contain a valid alias configuration

To fix this I had to:

  1. cd /usr/local/lib/node_modules/packageName
  2. cd ..
  3. rm -rf packageName
  4. In the root directory of the library, run:
a) rm -rf dist
b) npm run build
c) cd dist 
d) npm link
  1. In the consuming app, update the package.json with:
"packageName": "file:/path/to/local/node_module/packageName""
  1. In the root directory of the consuming app run npm link packageName

Comments

5

In my case, to the very end of the webpack.config.js, where I should exports the config, there was a typo: export(should be exports), which led to failure with loading webpack.config.js at all.

const path = require('path');

const config = {
    mode: 'development',
    entry: "./lib/components/Index.js",
    output: {
        path: path.resolve(__dirname, 'public'),
        filename: 'bundle.js'
    },
    module: {
        rules: [
            {
                test: /\.js$/,
                loader: 'babel-loader',
                exclude: path.resolve(__dirname, "node_modules")
            }
        ]
    }
}

// pay attention to "export!s!" here
module.exports = config;

Comments

4

For anyone building an ionic app and trying to upload it. Make sure you added at least one platform to the app. Otherwise you will get this error.

Comments

4

In my experience, this error was as a result of improper naming of aliases in Webpack. In that I had an alias named redux and webpack tried looking for the redux that comes with the redux package in my alias path.

To fix this, I had to rename the alias to something different like Redux.

Comments

3

In my case (lolz),

I was importing a local package (that I was developing, and building with rollup) via NPM/Yarn link, into another package I was developing. The imported package was a load of React components, and was configured to have a peerDependency of react and react-dom.

The consuming package was being built with Webpack and obviously wasn't correctly feeding the installed react and react-dom libraries into my local dependency as it was compiling it.

I adjusted my webpack configuration to indicate it should alias those peer dependencies to the correct dependencies in the consuming package:

/* ... */

resolve: {
  extensions: [/* make sure you have them all correct here, as per other answers */],
  alias: {
    react: path.resolve('./node_modules/react'),
    'react-dom': path.resolve('./node_modules/react-dom')
  }
},

/* ... */

Obviously you need to import path in the webpack.config.js file in order to use the methods seen above.

A more detailed explanation can be found in this article

Comments

3

In my case I had accidentally imported this package while trying to use process.env:

import * as process from 'process';

Removing it fixed the problem.

Comments

3

A possible reason, would be, if you have nullified a certain dependency in webpack.config.js:

resolve: {
    fallback: {
        fs: false,
        path: false,
    },
},

You also need to add to package.json:

"browser": {
    "fs": false,
    "path": false,
}, 

Comments

3

I solved that issue by adding an extensionAlias property in webpack.config.js:

resolve: {
  extensions: [".ts", ".tsx", ".js"],
  extensionAlias: {
    ".js": [".js", ".ts"],
    ".cjs": [".cjs", ".cts"],
    ".mjs": [".mjs", ".mts"]
  }
},

Comments

2

In my case I was using invalid templateUrl.By correcting it problem solved.

@Component({
        selector: 'app-edit-feather-object',
        templateUrl: ''
    })

Comments

2

My case was similar to @witheng's answer.

At some point, I noticed some casing error in some file names in my development environment. For example the file name was

type.ts

and I renamed it to

Type.ts

In my Mac dev environment this didn't register as a change in git so this change didn't go to source control.

In the Linux-based build machine where the filenames are case-sensitive it wasn't able to find the file with different casing.

To avoid issues like this in the future, I ran this command in the repo:

git config core.ignorecase false

5 Comments

Volkan, how can I get in touch with you? You website has no email on it. Want to ask a question about one of your blog posts, namely volkanpaksoy.com/archive/2018/12/19/…
@RobertBenedetto Probably easiest and most efficient way would be asking it here (or another StackExchange site if it's more relevant to your question) and post the link here. Then not only I can take a look but you'd probably get faster and better help from the entire community.
True. I'll do that. However, was just going to ask you to update it since the procedure for step 5 seems to have changed, and ask if there is any way to do step 6 using the AWS management site? I'm pretty entry level with AWS, and those two steps are very confusing.
It's been a while since I published that post and I don't really using EC2 instances at the moment. I wasn't aware of the changes. Hope somebody will be able to weigh in with the latest information. Have you also checked out the links in the resources section? If the resources in that post updated maybe you can get the latest info from them as well.
2

In my case, I imported library files like:

import { MyFile } from "my-library/public-api";

After I removed the public-api from the import everything worked fine:

import { MyFile } from "my-library";

MyFile is exported in the public-api file in the library.

Comments

2

I was getting this error when running a GitHub action. The issue was because I'd listed the package as a peer dependency instead of a dependency.

Since I'm using Rollup, the solution was to install the package both as a peer dependency and a dev dependency, and use rollup-plugin-peer-deps-external to remove the dev dependency from the final build.

Comments

2

For me the issue was, I was importing

.ts files into .js files

changing them to ts as well solved the issue.

Comments

2

In my case, I had a mixture of enum and interface in the index.d.ts file.
I extracted enums into another file and the issue resolved.

Comments

2

In my case, entry field was missing under module.exports in webpack.config.js, causing this issue.

1 Comment

can some on answer this question if they have come across?
2

In my case,

I have mistakenly removed a library ("mini-create-react-context") from package.json. I added that back, and did yarn install and build the app and it start working properly. So please take a look at your package.json file once.

Comments

2

For anyone using Webpack's Module Federation plugin:
I had a typo in the value of one of the fileds in the 'exposes' entry of the plugin.
Check your spelling:

exposes: {
            './ShopApp': './src/bootstrap' // check this value
        }

Comments

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.