7
\$\begingroup\$

It’s that time of the year again! As we bid farewell to the year that's concluded and welcome the new one, we have a tradition of sharing moderation stats for the preceding calendar year.

As most of you here might be aware, sites on the Stack Exchange network are moderated somewhat differently to other sites on the web:

We designed the Stack Exchange network engine to be mostly self-regulating, in that we amortize the overall moderation cost of the system across thousands of teeny-tiny slices of effort contributed by regular, everyday users.
-- A Theory of Moderation

That doesn't eliminate the need for having moderators altogether, but it does mean that the bulk of moderation work is carried out by regular folks — folks like you. Every bit of time and effort y'all contribute to the site gives you access to more privileges you can use to help in this effort, all of which produce a cumulative effect that makes a big difference in ensuring Stack Exchange sites remain a valuable source of high-quality content on the web.

So as we leave 2024 behind and spring into 2025, let us look back at what we accomplished as a community... by looking at some data! Below is a breakdown of moderation actions performed on Code Review over the past 12 months:

Action Moderators Community User¹ Community²
All comments on a post moved to chat 0 0 0
Answer flags handled 283 61 0
Answers flagged 30 83 231
Bounties canceled 0 0 0
Comment flags handled 695 233 8
Comments deleted⁸ 1,887 1 1,891
Comments flagged 151 10 775
Comments undeleted 20 0 0
Escalations to the Community Manager team 1 0 0
Posts bumped 0 117 0
Posts deleted⁷ 132 1,692 443
Posts locked 16 39 0
Posts undeleted 16 0 88
Posts unlocked 4 11 0
Question flags handled⁶ 185 153 4
Questions closed 227 335 1
Questions flagged⁶ 12 93 248
Questions merged 0 0 0
Questions migrated 1 2 0
Questions protected 21 3 0
Questions reopened 22 9 0
Questions unprotected 0 0 0
Revisions redacted 4 0 0
Tag highlight language set 0 0 0
Tag synonyms created 1 0 0
Tag synonyms proposed 1 0 0
Tags merged 1 0 0
Tasks reviewed⁵: "Close votes" 116 0 487
Tasks reviewed⁵: "First answers" 46 0 330
Tasks reviewed⁵: "First questions" 69 0 909
Tasks reviewed⁵: "Late answers" 3 0 89
Tasks reviewed⁵: "Low quality posts" 6 0 101
Tasks reviewed⁵: "Reopen votes" 23 0 82
Tasks reviewed⁵: "Suggested edits" 82 42 493
Tasks reviewed⁵: "Triage" 0 0 0
User banned from review 1 0 0
User review-bans lifted early 0 0 0
User suspensions lifted early 3 0 0
Users contacted 17 0 0
Users deleted 0 0 0
Users destroyed⁴ 53 0 0
Users suspended³ 20 166 0

Footnotes

¹ This refers to the automated systems otherwise known as user #-1.

² This refers to the membership of Code Review without diamonds next to their names.

³ The system will suspend users under three circumstances: when a user is recreated after being previously suspended, when a user is recreated after being destroyed for spam or abuse, and when a network-wide suspension is in effect on an account.

⁴ A "destroyed" user is deleted along with all that they had posted: questions, answers, comments. Generally used as an expedient way of getting rid of spam.

⁵ This counts every review that was submitted (not skipped) - so the 2 suggested edits reviews needed to approve an edit would count as 2, the goal being to indicate the frequency of moderation actions. This also applies to flags, etc.

⁶ Includes close flags (but not close or reopen votes). The community² can handle these flags by at least one person voting to close a question that has a close flag.

⁷ This ignores numerous deletions that happen automatically in response to some other action.

⁸ This includes comments deleted by their own authors (which also account for some number of handled comment flags).

Further reading:

Wishing you all a happy 2025! ^_^

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ "Questions closed: 227, 335, 1". I understand Moderators. But Community User and Community seem to be the wrong way around? But then how is Community 1? IDK the numbers don't make sense to me. Do you know what's up? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 15 at 16:54
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Peilonrayz 335 for Community would be more along expectations. This certainly looks wrong (or at least confusing) in last year as well where we had 341, 515, 0. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 15 at 17:30
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Hey JNat, I think you posted a fair amount of the "year in moderation" posts so the above comment(s) could easily have gotten lost. Just sending another ping to make sure the notification arrived safely. :) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 23 at 13:28

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.