Re: Proposal to increase the required majority for all RFCs

From:	Andrea Faulds	Date:	Sat, 17 May 2014 19:50:50 +0000
Subject:	Re: Proposal to increase the required majority for all RFCs
References:	1 2	Groups:	php.internals
Request:	Send a blank email to internals+get-74295@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message

On 17 May 2014, at 20:46, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote:

> Implementation changes don't fit in this RFC process too well.
> Implementation changes should be dealt with by those who own the
> implementation.

I don’t and can’t agree with this. Zend changes will ultimately affect everyone.

It is not just Zend maintainers who’ll be affected by the 64-bit patch, for example. Everyone
would, as it would increase PHP’s memory usage.

Also, I am unconvinced that just because the people who maintain Zend (say) want something, that
they are necessarily right.
--
Andrea Faulds
http://ajf.me/






   

Thread (15 messages)

• Andrea FauldsSat, 17 May 2014 18:57:11 +0000
  • Pierre JoyeSat, 17 May 2014 19:22:11 +0000
  • Zeev SuraskiSat, 17 May 2014 19:46:00 +0000RE: [PHP-DEV] Proposal to increase the required majority for all RFCs
    • Andrea FauldsSat, 17 May 2014 19:50:50 +0000Re: Proposal to increase the required majority for all RFCs
      • Zeev SuraskiSat, 17 May 2014 20:22:39 +0000RE: [PHP-DEV] Proposal to increase the required majority for all RFCs
      • Pierre JoyeSat, 17 May 2014 20:25:00 +0000
      • Dmitry StogovSat, 17 May 2014 20:36:22 +0000
        • Pierre JoyeSat, 17 May 2014 20:42:11 +0000
          • Dmitry StogovSat, 17 May 2014 20:47:05 +0000
            • Pierre JoyeSat, 17 May 2014 20:50:15 +0000
      • Stas MalyshevSat, 17 May 2014 20:49:32 +0000
  • Kris CraigSat, 17 May 2014 23:48:43 +0000
    • guilhermeblanco@gmail.comSun, 18 May 2014 05:02:06 +0000
      • Ferenc KovacsSun, 18 May 2014 09:06:47 +0000
        • Kris CraigSun, 18 May 2014 09:10:25 +0000