Re: Proposal to increase the required majority for all RFCs
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote:
> I think that the serious core changes require technical expertise before
> voting (like Nikita made).
> And the results of such expertise should be published in additional to RFC
> on the same page.
So basically, based on what you say, many if not all new features in
5.4 or 5.5 would have been rejected per se because they were done by
new developers.
Sorry, I rather prefer to keep things like they are and improve/solve
confusing wording instead of going back to the benevolent dictators
time.
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org
Thread (15 messages)