Re: Proposal to increase the required majority for all RFCs

From:	Ferenc Kovacs	Date:	Sun, 18 May 2014 09:06:47 +0000
Subject:	Re: Proposal to increase the required majority for all RFCs
References:	1 2 3	Groups:	php.internals
Request:	Send a blank email to internals+get-74333@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message

On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 7:02 AM, guilhermeblanco@gmail.com <
guilhermeblanco@gmail.com> wrote:

> My vote is for 66%+1 on engine and/or language changes and 50%+1 on side
> changes.
> If I want to suggest a Jsonable interface which purely affects a subset of
> functions and nothing else, I don't think 66% is needed for change to go
> in.
>
> My 2¢,
>
>
this is what I would consider reasonable too, with the extension than any
removal of existing (and documented) functionallity should also require 2/3
of the votes.

-- 
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu


   

Thread (15 messages)

• Andrea FauldsSat, 17 May 2014 18:57:11 +0000
  • Pierre JoyeSat, 17 May 2014 19:22:11 +0000
  • Zeev SuraskiSat, 17 May 2014 19:46:00 +0000RE: [PHP-DEV] Proposal to increase the required majority for all RFCs
    • Andrea FauldsSat, 17 May 2014 19:50:50 +0000Re: Proposal to increase the required majority for all RFCs
      • Zeev SuraskiSat, 17 May 2014 20:22:39 +0000RE: [PHP-DEV] Proposal to increase the required majority for all RFCs
      • Pierre JoyeSat, 17 May 2014 20:25:00 +0000
      • Dmitry StogovSat, 17 May 2014 20:36:22 +0000
        • Pierre JoyeSat, 17 May 2014 20:42:11 +0000
          • Dmitry StogovSat, 17 May 2014 20:47:05 +0000
            • Pierre JoyeSat, 17 May 2014 20:50:15 +0000
      • Stas MalyshevSat, 17 May 2014 20:49:32 +0000
  • Kris CraigSat, 17 May 2014 23:48:43 +0000
    • guilhermeblanco@gmail.comSun, 18 May 2014 05:02:06 +0000
      • Ferenc KovacsSun, 18 May 2014 09:06:47 +0000
        • Kris CraigSun, 18 May 2014 09:10:25 +0000